Page 17 - Process Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Supervisor of elections brenda snipes. >> all of the mail ballots have been open and are in the type elation room for processing. for provisional ballots -- >> this is information that should've already been compiled. that's a whole another issue. >> this is a process question, when we will get to the end of the counting. >> we don't know. there will be challenges, more questions, definitely questions about this process and about brenda snipes and her record on the job. and it really is a question, i think, for rick scott and why he didn't replace her before this close and contentious election...

To rod rosenstein that drafted the memo and he has the ability or discretion to provide that information to congress and also to release it publicly, shep. >> shepard: catherine, no word from the special counsel on this or anything else, right? >> and that's typical. the office does not comment on matters of process and they would see this as a process question. but we do know that they have indicted or have guilty pleas from 32 people, four former trump campaign aides but the charges have been for crimes prior to the campaign or for lying to federal investigators. on "60 minutes" the presiden...

He wants to know can you corroborate ford or ramirez. that is where he draws the line. and the other stuff to him, unless the fbi comes up with something stunning didn't seem to him relevant. fair characterization? >> i think that is where this is all going and this is what jeff flake was asking for. essentially to have somebody independent, the fbi, to come in and try to figure out where the gaps in the story are. you have these two stories from dr. ford and from judge kavanaugh that are so different from each other. he denies it, she claims it, but there are missing pieces to about it. the f...

Republican senators say it is disqualifying if it is true. particularly given he is asserting it is not. he will testify under oath it is not. especially against the back drop. democrats accused him of being untruthful on testimony on three other matters in this hearing or two other hearings. by definition, if enough republican senators believe this, it will be disqualifying. this is polarizing. you have a substantive question and process. is there corroboration? there are any other allegations? those are two big areas. the process question is what investigation is going to happen between now ...

Organized over the weekend by chuck schumer, the senate minority leader. talked to members on the committee, the rank and file democrats in particular on that committee, who wanted to take a much tougher line because of their frustration. grassley and the republicans were caught flat footed on that, but grassley did not want to give an inch on this because if he gave them an inch, they could take a mile. then where does it go from there? he believes if he keeps this process moving forward, ultimately, he'll get confirmed. but this is just a start. tomorrow is questioning. the day after is goin...