Live Breaking News & Updates on Promptu Systems Corporation
Stay updated with breaking news from Promptu systems corporation. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation, Appeal No. 2022-1939 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2024) Our Case of the Week focuses on a district court’s claim construction. ....
TechShout - When handset users want to give their fingers a little break from all that typing and punching in of numbers, they look to other means of input such as voice and for employing the choices in the Android Market, we have listed below 5 best Android voice to text apps. You can certainly work wonders by exerting that simple yet extremely useful gift of speech especially, when it comes to minimizing the use of your appendages. 1 – Vlingo Virtual Assistant: Vlingo Virtual Assistant from Vlingo Corp. is deemed as the finest voice-powered virtual assist on the Android platform. By simply talking to Vlingo on your handset, more productivity can be acquired at a faster pace. As the company suggests, commands like ‘find Italian restaurants’ or even ‘Text Jonathan, what’s up?’ can be executed with panache. ....
In Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Promptu Systems Corp., 1 the Federal Circuit held that the plain meaning of the claim phrase “command function” was limited to functions that command an action to be taken. The meaning of this claim phrase turned out to be a focal point, and Comcast lost its invalidity challenge to the claims as a result of this interpretation. Comcast filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) of U.S. Patent No. 7,260,538 (the ’538 patent) on the grounds that the contested claims would have been obvious in view of two prior art references U.S. Patent No. 6,513,063 (Julia) or U.S. Patent No. 7,013,283 (Murdock) alone or in combination with U.S. Patent No. 5,774,859 (Houser). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) instituted review and issued a final-written decision in each IPR. The Board rejected Comcast’s interpretation of the claim language “command function” as unreasonably broad. Since Comcast’s contentions were ba ....