Page 5 - Prosecutions Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Hush Money Payment he paid to stormy daniels, that those were not reimbursements. Those were actually just retainers for Michael Cohen, correct . Whats at issue in this case is Business Records is entries and President Trumps personal ledger that reflected payments to Michael Cohen as legal retainer payments. Its worth noting those entries were made by a midlevel Trump Organization Official in Trump Tower while President Trump was in the White House running the country, its also worth noting that Michael Cohen was President Trumps lawyer. And that therefore we believe these records were both a...

As being something he wanted to stop before the election. Yeah. And this is why david is so critical to pick off the Prosecutions Case because he will show that this wasnt just a woman who came forward with allegations after the access hollywood tape, someone needed to do something. This is all part of a Plan And Something that they had already done with the least one other woman. And of course, also with this doormat who falsely alleged that trump had fathered a child out of wedlock. They had already paid people to keep quiet about unfavorable attorney saying i have a spoiler alert. Theres no...

Prosecutions case. Catherine talked about the difference between the Pre Pop Drans of the evidence as a civil standard versus Beyond A Reasonable Doubt as a cal standard. You want to hone in on that, because you dont have this Hero Figure you can make your defendant out to be. Quite frankly, hes not a very sympathetic victim. You say, look, the Prosecution Cant meet its burden here. They have all these holes, bad witnesses. Youve got michael cohen, stormy daniels. Their testimony doesnt matter because you Cant Focus on your client, so youve got to focus on dismantling their case. Charles, how ...

Share and at that point, it was Michael Cohen who paid her 130,000 to keep her story silent. David pecker in realtime, we are being told from inside of the courtroom, is now taking the stand and he is being sworn in to testify for what could be for a number of days, andrea. And chuck, this opening statement, it was supposed to be a statement with just facts, no argument. Thats why its called the opening statement. Its closing arguments. But chuck, at this point, how do you explain all the objections we saw . It sounded to me some of those statements were, the Prosecutions Case is a lie. Well, ...

Lawyers are always a going if to be setting up their case. So theyre that going to pent the fact for their arguments with a particular slant to prepare the jury for what the jurys going to hear when the evidence actually comes in. Will im curious. I went to Law School are, been around lawyers much of my life. If i asked you, a lot of people say the trial is over once the jury is sworn in. That shows the importance of voir dire, of picking the secure. Jury with. But after that, opening or, closing, examination, how would you rank the most important parts of the trial . The most important part, ...