Prosecutor Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Georgia, he met Misty Hampton, and somehow got her number and went back to the white house with it. And that was someone that they were on the phone with very quickly after that, obviously trying to get access to the Voting Software and Coffee County. When meadows went on to georgia, the Misty Hampton Coffee County story is interesting, just to remind folks of that story. Which cnn broke yesterday. And caitlin, you will jump in if i get any of this wrong. But it seems as though Coffee County Election Officials invited Trump Campaign officials to basically have access to their Voting Machines. ...

Passed because richard gates is now looking at 18 months if he offers substantial cooperation. prosecutors are pretty hard core about how they define that, and so mr. gates will have to give up the goods against someone to provide the prosecutor information it doesn't already have, help it make a case. >> paul, stay with us for a moment if you can. phil, let me ask you, behind the scenes at the white house i've had these conversations as well. the bottom line is this russia thing is paralyzing behind closed doors. there are meetings, at least in recent weeks and months, that would go on where ...

Subpoena can give you a weird reverse kind of air cover to where it's sometimes worked out with your council, you can say look, this wasn't my idea to do this, i was compelled to go up here. >> see my arm being twisted. voluntarily giving the prosecutor information that could incriminate the trump administration as to the ultimate question here, purported by the new york times reporting, why didn't bannon require a subpoena. it's possibly the most simple answer. he has incriminating information about his former colleagues and he doesn't want to give it up easily. >> pretend you are the lead in...

With your council, you can say look, this wasn't my idea to do this, i was compelled to go up here. >> see my arm being twisted. voluntarily giving the prosecutor information that could incriminate the trump administration as to the ultimate question here, purported by the new york times reporting, why didn't bannon require a subpoena. it's possibly the most simple answer. he has incriminating information about his former colleagues and he doesn't want to give it up easily. >> pretend you are the lead investigation on the mueller panel. what are the questions you want them to answer? >> i love...

Where they're not asserting executive privilege in their conversations with bob mueller, but they're having witnesses assert it with the hill which may or not be tenable. in the end, these things have a vested interest without having work these things out. if history is any guide, this thing will get smoothed over. >> back to another point julia made in passing, that is when a subpoena can give you a weird reverse kind of air cover to where it's sometimes worked out with your council, you can say look, this wasn't my idea to do this, i was compelled to go up here. >> see my arm being twisted. ...