Page 32 - Public Editor News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> public editor. and in her article admits that at least five other outlets confirmed it was a criminal inquiry separate from "the new york times." >> but they were wrong. >> but, they were wrong because palmieri says so because somebody from the clinton camp. >> it was not a criminal referral. we know that to be true. >> we don't know that to be true. >> the inspectors general -- jon: not all of the shoes have dropped in the hillary clinton email investigation. >> we know. but that is separate issue. jon: but you will grant not all of the shoes have dropped. >> absolutely. in terms whether t...

And what the public editor did not say, and what the editor acknowledged was that they changed it you said it wasn't fast enough? within a few hours of it hitting online because the hillary camp called them and they changed the story. >> they knew it was wrong. >> how did they know? >> they realized they got caught. wait a minute you're accusing "the times" going after hillary, doing this on purpose for idealogically reasons because she is not liberal enough for the no, times. "the times" purposely did this -- >> something clearly you admit was very wrong and was wrong enough to where they eve...

Welcome back. we just heard from the clinton campaign about what they call an egraj egregious error by the new york times. this is what they do. they try to discourage bad press. the new york times own public editor their ombudsman weighed in this morning. she said by rushing to rush the public the scoop the times failed to make sure the story was correct. precisely when it's most loyal readers count on. want to hear what carl bernstein has to say about this. he is now a cnn commentator and author of "the woman in charge the life of hillary rodham clinton." >> this was an egregious error. it w...

Department to hillary clinton is not the subject of any criminal inquiry to there is no criminal inquiry. the times changes the headline, the lead, they publish not one but two corrections. over the weekend, the "new york times" public editor, the reader's advocate at the paper weighed in. "a clinton story fraught with inaccuracies." and then after that, today we get this editor's note about how the paper got a bunch of stuff wrong. how they mishandled even the corrections and still don't now how it all happened. this was a big high-profile disaster for the "new york times." it was also a remi...

Issued the following day. even more of a jaw hitting the floor discovery. turns out that possible criminal investigation in to hillary clinton not only was it not a criminal investigation in to hillary clinton, there was no criminal investigation period. the senior government officials, whoever they are, they were wrong about that. there was no criminal referral. within a couple of days it goes from being how hillary clinton is the subject of a criminal inquiry by the justice department to hillary clinton is not the subject of any criminal inquiry to there is no criminal inquiry. the times cha...