Page 38 - Public Editor News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That has happened. he has vehemently denied it. "the new york times" was harshly criticized by their own public editor for speculating in print this was true of that evidence. i think it is important to use common sense here. he is a very smart individual. he knew what the value was of what he had. if he were willing to share -- just use common sense -- to share what the russian government or with the chinese government what it is that he had in order to benefit himself or promote his self-interests he could have gone to either of those governments before he came to us and sold that informatio...

Attack a prepress first. that's why a prepress is guaranteed and so that i can as a journalist help may fellow citizens the government is collecting all of their phone records and e-mail records and tapping into their facebook conversations and google chats and skype telephone calls and this is what journalism is about. shining a light on what the most powerful people in the country are doing to them and in the dark. we are going to continue to do that no matter what david gregory and his friends say. >> that's guardian columnist glen greenwald, deep pending his reporting on government spying....

Perceived which is in order to be a, quote unquote, real journalist you have to hide your political opinions or pretend that you have none. as human beings we all have strong political opinions and i've always personally believed that it's much more honest and it makes you much more credible to say explicitly what your opinions are rather than try and conceal them or hide them or have this conceit that you are free of them. i think that our reporting stands on its own. we published five stories now, all breaking news. the only one about which there's been any questions raised is one of the sto...

And may well damage or relationships and reputation in that key part of the world. >> mr. assange can say whatever he likes about the greater good he thinks he and his source are doing, but the truth is they might have already have on that you are hands the blood of some young soldier or that of an afghan family. >> back to today, the doj's monitoring of the ap goes beyond -- "new york times" public editor explained the stakes, writing this is about the right of citizens to know what their government is doing, in at atmosphere of secrets -- that's getting harder every day. joining the panel no...

To the stupid video. that has been going on since, you know, literally day one. and now we get whether it is, you know, dana milbank in the "the washington post" doing his best to dismiss the testimony as a yarn to very serious criticisms of the "new york times" from their own public editor. but one of the most disturbing things is, you know, what's going on with cbs. even though they have done a better job covering it thanks to sharyl attkisson is allegations that their ability to get along with her they say, according to politico that she is actually coming close to being, you know, pushing ...