Question Wasn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That. >> every precaution and the number of attacks that were ordered. the silence of those attacks it means something too. it is difficult to prove that negative. >> does that wash? >> of course it doesn't but here is the deal. the reason they do this is the press lets them get away with it. when you watch the news conference today when something went wrong or the situation at the border when they banned oversight of flights. the press isn't going into an uproar. when i was in office there was instant support, it was emotional, from the heart, a feeding frenzy, they were practically out of th...

Spying on, wiretapping of its political opponents., if that's not a scandal i'm not sure what qualifies as one. >> you think about all of the years after 9/11 we had these huge debates about this surveillance power that was given the federal government and obviously that was targeting non-u.s. persons operating overseas. this question wasn't what if this amazing power was someday turned on the political adversaries of the party in power? now it's happened and everyone seemed satisfied -- i noticed everyone but much of the media is more concerned with how president trump is tweeting about it an...

Attorney general's explanation just a few minutes ago that he interpreted the question to mean did you talk to the russians as a surrogate for the campaign about the campaign. the answer was no. question wasn't did you ever talk to russians at any time during the campaign. the public can decide for themselves because you ran the entire thing if the answer was truthful. if then senator sessions interpretation of the question was a fair one on the basis of the context. i happen to think it was. but the public will decide for themselves. this is not the type of case where a person is prosecuted f...

My friend and colleague reverend al sharpton happened exactly one month ago. moments after an arkansas state judge declared that the state's voter id law was, as reverend said, unconstitutional. as written, the law requires voter id's, bans out of state college id's, and forces voters without voter id to prove that they were too poor to get one. now, fast forward 30 days, and as msnbc.com zach roth points out, the arkansas law has twice been struck down by the same state court judge, tim fox, who ruled that it violates the state constitution's right to vote. since many arkansasans lack id and ...

Prompted at least one legal group to tweet at the doj, and the problems don't stop there. election officials said 80% of absentee votes in one county were disqualified because of a lack of identification wrfsh this wree minded some of painful time in the not so distant past. >> once upon a time we weren't allowed. they wouldn't count it. it was just like being ignored and being, well, unimportant. the question is with voter id laws in effect in more than half the country, are we moving backwards instead of forward? zach roth covers voting rights for msnbc.com. to clarify, the voter id law was ...