Page 2 - Questioning Horowitz News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Fbi director who leaked the information to get the special counsel in the first place and the same inspector general who found that facts establishing that that same fbi director was in fact targeting donald trump at the same time in an investigation where he said he wasn't investigating donald trump. now, you might think that this committee would be interested in hearing from that inspector general for the first time rather than hearing from you for the fourth time. but maybe you can be helpful, because the party of impeachment, they don't care, mr. lewandowski, what kind of impeachment you c...

And then they've taken aim at jerry nadler saying they're holding this hearing today, in fact, so he could call the inspector general, michael horowitz and have him testify about what he recently concluded that fbi james comey and coloring outside the lines in the handling of these memos that kick started the special counsel investigation. sort of a lot of drama, a lot of heat, not a lot of new information, except for that one detail from lewandowski that he said he didn't chicken out, rather he went on a family vacation. that is why, he says, he did not deliver that message to the attorney ge...

Democrats want to ignore all of the real evidence of russian interference and hold this fake impeachment because it happened under a different president's watch. this all happened under president obama's watch, isn't that correct? >> yes, sir. >> it was the obama administration that failed to protect us from the russian interference and influence in our election, isn't that also true? >> yes. >> president trump wasn't president. he wasn't the one that failed to protect the country. if anybody failed, it was the obama administration, is that right? >> yes, it is. >> i have said it before and i'...

Are done. we got this whole issue with consultants. maybe we would be better served if we did exactly what mr. chapman said. maybe we would be better served as the white house judiciary committee if we focused on how this whole false accusation started in the first place. what do you think, mr. lewandowski? >> i think it would be a great idea. >> maybe the american people would be better served than spending more time investigating something that's already had 32 months of investigation from jim comey and the fbi and bob mueller and the special counsel. maybe we would do that. do you know a gr...

The rules they changed last week talk about staff asking questions after members are dope we got this whole issue with consultants. so this may be we would be better served. if we exactly what mr. shabot said, as the house judiciary committee if we focused on how u this whole false b accusation started in the first place what do you think? >> i think it would be a great idea >> great idea. maybe the american people would be better served than spending more time investigating something that's had 32 months of investigation from jim comey and the fbi and mueller and special counsel. you know a g...