Quit Pro News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Capricious, ash tear or made sense. The Supreme Court in boumedin struck it down saying it was not an adequate substitute for habeas. Thats correct, senator. Your role was to find out a way to engage congress on the Detainee Treatment because it was your view that congress, being involved, would strengthen the president s hand . As a lawyer . Yes. I was not a policymaker but i did advise. As a lawyer. As did many others. There were very other many fine lawyers, too, senator, who advised the administration that Engaging Congress would be a good idea, because we had read our youngstown and our j...

Former independent counsel concluded this from what he has heard so far. >> clearly in his opening statement of quit pro kuo and then he says later well, the president said i don't want anything, right? president zelensky should do the right thing. you cannot convict -- you shouldn't charge but you can't convict a sitting president on the basis of conflicting and ambiguous evidence. >> sandra: there is one republican in the house who was in that room yesterday that perhaps is democrats' best hope at getting to vote yes on impeachment, congressman will hurd. he was not convinced over impeachmen...

>> garrett, democrats seem to be seizing on the new details about those text messages between diplomats about ukraine. >> reporter: yes, the text messages are interesting for what we know about them and mysterious for what we don't. the smoking text message, if you will, is between these two diplomats, bill taylor, the acting ambassador to ukraine and gordon sunderland, a political appointee, ally of president trump who was ambassador to the eu. it reads in part from taylor, as i said on the phony think it's crazy to withhold security assistance for help on a political campaign. five hours the...

Lawfully. it was a good faith negotiations to resolve all matters with him. do you think this conduct, from what we know, fits into the category of federal extorsion? >> let's talk about what extorsion is real quick. it's threatening either physical harm or harm to reputation in return be for most often money or a thing of value. it doesn't have to be money. the normal iteration is if you don't pay me $10,000, i'm going to publish these pictures. here it's if you don't step forward and not investigate this or step forward and say it's not political, you know, we're going to publish these photo...

Disingenuous in some of his answers today. for example, when he was, as andrea pointed out, when he was asked about some of the, his memoranda and the torture memo thing and he said i haven't seen that. they've been in the newspapers. clearly his aides, his handlers have that material, so it can't be that he hasn't seen that material. he also said when asked about for example campaign finance law, he said that there was a lot of room to regulate expenditures and there really, i have to say as somebody who reads these opinions, i think the supreme court has said congress cannot regulate expendi...