Page 12 - Rate Shock News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Party is -- the f word. when you look at the rate shock, the cost of this, the website failure, people can't keep thein plan, what's the political fallout considering none of what the president promised is true. what's going to happen? >> i believe it will be something like it was in 2010. maybe worse. now we'll see reality of it. the website not working is the least of it. i think they will be worse off when the website starts working. >> and the rate shock. >> when they start signing up people for medicaid. so far two-thirds go to medicaid. less than one-third goes to private insurance. it h...

Party is -- the f word. when you look at the rate shock, the cost of this, the website failure, people can't keep their plan, what's the political fallout considering none of what the president promised is true. what's going to happen? >> i believe it will be something like it was in 2010. maybe worse. now we'll stee reality of it. the website not working is the least of it. i think they will be worse off when the website starts working. >> and the rate shock. >> when they start signing up people for medicaid. so far two-thirds go to medicaid. less than one-third goes to private insurance. it ...

Make this change, presumably at the request of secretary sebelius, but why did you not want people to see what the actual cost was going to be without the subsidy? i've got to believe that the rate shock was something that they truly feared and that people would not sign up. then you get into the problems of adverse selection. your doctor who you had on is exactly right, january 1st, there's going to be a big problem with paying doctors. if they don't get the website problem fixed at some point or fixed enough at some point that we'll stop talking about it, but the cost a year from now is goin...

Make this change, presumably at the request of secretary sebelius, but why did you not want people to see what the actual cost was going to be without the subsidy? i've got to believe that the rate shock was something that they truly feared and that people would not sign up. then you get into the problems of adverse selection. your doctor who you had on is exactly right, january 1st, there's going to be a big problem with paying doctors. if they don't get the website problem fixed at some point or fixed enough at some point that we'll stop talking about it, but the cost a year from now is goin...

Make this change, presumably at the request of secretary sebelius, but why did you not want people to see what the actual cost was going to be without the subsidy? i've got to believe that the rate shock was something that they truly feared and that people would not sign up. then you get into the problems of adverse selection. your doctor who you had on is exactly right, january 1st, there's going to be a big problem with paying doctors. if they don't get the website problem fixed at some point or fixed enough at some point that we'll stop talking about it, but the cost a year from now is goin...