Reasoningible Doubt News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Investigation, and it locks witnesses in a version of the events, if she says the light was green at the accident, and later forgets, you have a transcript of proof of what color the light was when she saw the accident. so really important to lock in witnesses, and one other effect, it's such a good one. you don't go to a grand jury simply to indict. i think that would be unethical, and foolish. you ask a grand jury toin diet when you believe you have evidence sufficient to convict a trial. nothing is gained in indicting a case f you don't convict a trial. that requires proof beyond a reasonab...

Universe. it's a difference in kind when you talk about the scrutinies and the pressure and the standards and the resources that will be available to the people in the trump -- if that is where this guys. >> sure, chris, but if mr. trump is indicted, he is not the first defendant with ample resources to hire attorneys to defend him. your question is, can a criminal department handle a case like this? you need a judge who can control her courtroom, who is smart and doesn't play to the cameras. you need good advocates on both sides and you need good evidence because it has to prove the case behi...

Doubt that someone or something committed a crime. so my understanding, the way it was explained to me. they moved on to the evidence presenting phase, which suggests the prosecutors are convinced by the evidence they have seen and are ready to present at this time a grand jury, and see if the grand jury too shares that conclusion. >> chuck, what is your reaction? how does it jive with how you think about this? >> i'm so glad rebecca's here. because practice in state grand juries is different in federal. of course there's a grand jury. you issue subpoenas to banks to get records. that is part ...