circuit court of appeals. they are saying that the this decision will prevent the reenstatement of those travel restrictions, senator, from those seven mostly muslim countries. your reaction. so if i m reading that correctly and interpreting that, they will start again those individuals being able to move freely from those countries. right. which is what s going on right now. correct. which is what s happening right now. the challenge this will be for the president or anyone dealing with immigration enforcement is how is any executive able to handle in the days ahead and what happens next. this is a major setback for the president. sure. you argued he had the legal authority to oppose these restrictions but this court of appeals these decision by the three federal judges says you know what, they re keeping the status quo in place. in other words, there are restrictions that the restrictions that the president wanted imposed are not going forward. right.
you re on the intelligence committee. do you believe that. we have a high level of risk, there is not a specific risk. in europe right now those individuals from isis are traveling with refugees. they are trying to be able to move through the asylum process. we ve seen that and it s documented. what the president stepped up to say it s the same thing that president obama said. let s get a chance to evaluate and make sure we re screening. how high is the risk from the seven countries that we re talking about that have these restrictions imposed because europe don t have the restrictions immoezed. most of the muslim nations, indonesia, no restrictions, egypt. the seven countries, how high is the risk. these seven countries are state sponsors of terrorism like iran or countries there is an active war going on. for instance, yemen, syria, iraq, somalia.