this is cnn breaking news. two prominent members of the oath keepers are being sentenced for their actions on the attack on the u.s. capitol on january 6th of 2021. the judge saying the actions of stewart rhodes, the founder and leader of the far right group oath keepers amounted to domestic terrorism, that he is going to be sentenced to 18 years in prison. kelly meggs also being sentenced. we have cnn crime and justice reporter katelyn polantz joining us. this just broke. tell us the very latest. reporter: right, so the judge has just delivered the sentence to stewart rhodes. he will be spending 18 years in federal prison for the crimes he committed up and until january 6th as he gathered oath keepers to washington, d.c. and they went inside the capitol, when he was leading the organization and wanting to essentially foment violence in the united states because of the transfer of power from donald trump to joe biden. the judge is just finishing his speech to rhodes and d
york. john, hello to you. john: hello to you, sandra. i am john roberts in washington. this is america reports. president biden and speaker mccarthy are working to nail down a deal. mccarthy says that could be any day now. despite both sides struggling to find common ground. sandra: the stakes couldn t be higher. rating agency putting the country s aaa rating on negative watch now as we approach the deadline. house majority leader steve scalise takes us inside the negotiations when he joins us live next h hour. let s go to the hill. what s the mood there? hey there, we are closer and closer to a deal, probably won t happen today according to folks that are close into the meetings and negotiations. this is all about leverage. and we are seeing clearly now that democrats don t really have much of it. a progressive chair woman a mill a eye a pal wouldn t admit to tanking a supposed bad deal if presented by the white house, and that is a huge take away because we are talk
pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time. pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does he - pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re short on time, what does he need. pandemic, we fed ukraine. we re. short on time, what does he need to do? bill short on time, what does he need to do? . . short on time, what does he need to do? ~ . . , , ., , do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, do? all dictate the premise or s tactics. i ll do? all dictate the premise or s tactics. i ll say do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we - do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we will - do? all dictate the premise or s tactics, i ll say that we will be l tactics, i ll say that we will be consistent over the next two weeks, pay less consistent over the next two weeks, pay l
six means biological six. now, labour like to talk the country down. they want to pretend that everything would be great if they have never left office and pretend that somehow we have not achieved anything, but that is just simply not right. remember the note that said there is no money left, when labour left office in 2010, unemployment was higher than when they came into government. public and private debt was accumulating, the banking system is broken, the deficit was ballooning, and even labour accepted that after years of spending, significant cuts in expenditure were required. they went into the 2010 election admitting they would have to make cuts. labour left britain on the brink of bankruptcy. and worse, the money that labour had put into public service had not been accompanied by sufficient reform. labour s welfare system was more about disguising how many people are out of work than actually getting people back into employment, and for all the money that labour had
security claims, and i won t agree to that. i put forward a proposal that will cut spending by more than $1 trillion, that freezes spending for the next two years, on top of the nearly $3 trillion in deficit reduction i previously proposed through spending cuts and new revenue raises. i propose making the wealthy pay their fair share, which will reduce the deficit but won t cut programs for hard working americans depending on those funds in order to continue big tax returns for the wealthiest americans. america and america s largest corporations. but we can reduce the deficit both in short term and long term with a combination of spending cuts on programs that help big oil and big pharma by closing tax loopholes and making the wealthy pay their fair share. i ve reduced the deficit $1.7 trillion without raising a cent and raising taxes on anyone