Stay updated with breaking news from Rightt bill. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Democratic party on the house intel committee to agree with you, congressman? that this has to be done in a way that s methodical to the american people know the truth or do you expect obstruction? i think there will be some obstruction. they will accuse us of trying to deflect the issue away from russia. we are going to go ahead with it. we have to go ahead with it. to me, i m one of those that believes we have to examine the russia issue as far as we possibly can and also this. right now to me, there is more credible accusations, if you will, on the side against susan rice than there is against president trump when it comes to russia. bill: now do you see it in the senate as being an obstructionist thing on the senate intel committee or do you think they are going to cooperate?mi i think they will cooperate. we have really locked arms throughout this investigation from the very beginning which was for us months ago in the starting that we agreed we are going to go where the fac ....
Information go after it was unmasked. bill: one more question to you, congressman. every morning the white house gets a briefing from the intel agencies. have you ever heard of national security advisor taking this kind of an interest for more than a year in a campaign or a transition or anything like that?t? you have been around for a while. have you ever heard of anything like that? bill, i think it s very unusual for a national security advisor to take this type of interest at all. may happen occasionally, but, to me, that s not her job. she s not an investigator. she is he not a cop or fbibi agent. her job is to set policy. if this is what people are saying it is, this is totally unusual and totally wrong and inappropriate. if we are talking about veracity here, remember, our first impression of susan rice and lasting impression is when she went on all the shows to say that the video was the sourcece of the benghazi bill: i don t think that s fair here. this is a different ....
This is the same accusations flying around with the irs, for instance, that the irs was using their tools for political purposes to be able to silent conservatives. if we get close to the campaign time period and they are using official documents, classified documents at that to either release names that s obviously a legal issue, to target individuals that are american citizens that were masked, that s called reverse targeting. but when you say you are targeting people internationally but actuallyly using that to be able to target american citizens, that s not legal, or to be able to use any official document for political purposes. those are all serious. bill: you heard malia zimmerman say the track she was on with adam housley was that it was a political play just as you are concerned about. but if susan rice comes before your committee, i can almost guarantee she is going to take the fifth, senator. not going to answer your questions. we still need to ask the n questions. i mea ....
bill: back of the book segment tonight, what the heck just happened? as can you imagine, the left is not happy about the susan rice/trump surveillance deal. president trump wants you to believe he is the victim of a crooked scheme those are his words. here are our words. there is no evidence of any wrongdoing. people do have power to unmask those names. susan rice would have been one of them. there is no big bombshell there. names can be unmasked if there is a counter intelligence investigation, which we know there was and for other reasons. this appears to be a story largely ginned up partly as a distraction from this larger investigation. bill: about russia, the larger investigation about russia. now, that s the liberal line. the rice deal distract from russia s interference in our election. here now to assess the reaction you just heard, bernard mcguirk. and greg gutfeld. ....
She does have a history there. but i don t know if that s. if we should prejudge. i m not prejudging.g. i m just saying when you are factor in everything you consider prior statements and prior conduct. bill: and that s true. gentlemen, thank you very much. please keep us posted. if you get anything, please let us know. our audience is very, very interested in this story. thank you, bill. thank you, senator. bill: directly ahead, no doubt partisan politics also impacts the investigation. we will tell you how. president trump being sued by protesters. law and order on the case upcoming. ....