exchanges back and forth, the guy that keeps going is who? who can keep talking. trump is the only one i know. he will never run out of stuff. to most of these people in politics, nothing comes to mind you hear me? this is a very important thing. nothing comes to mind they re out on the stage, there s a lot of pressure and nothing comes into their head and they re sitting there thinking what can i use that my staff gave me to use. is the moment that i think was the end of the tim pawlenty campaign, he had the canned attack on mitt romney in one of those early debates over romney care and obama care. he tried to pull it off. it was clearly rehearsed. romney looked at him and said nice try. guys who have facility out there, trump has it christie has a little bit of it but he s still living off the time he told that woman not to give him
be a good presidential candidate. trump resonates, he s a fighter. i think you need more rationale. why do you think jeb bush didn t do fine? we should get the sound. it s quite stunningly articulate quotes. my dad is probably the most perfect man alive, so it s very hard of me to be critical of him. in fact, i got a tee-shirt that says i m the, my dad s the greatest man alive, if you don t like it i ll take you outside. okay. well or you can put make america great on the cap. so jump in here. you know i remember mark halperin us talking the point four years ago being stunned that mitt romney still did not have an answer for romney care. we sat here going, he knew it was coming. how could he be in the middle of a campaign and still fought have
marketplace or ran in exchange in partnership with the federal government. and also, guess what, all but new mexico had democratic governors too in 2014. think there is not a partisan impact on this? but it is a different story in the states with the smallest drops in the uninsured rate. of the bottom ten in this category. more of a bipartisan mix. lots of republican legislative control. may notice by the way massachusetts on this map. sort of misleading. its drop is small because it had the lowest rate of uninsured for the past seven years due to something called a romney care. meanwhile, let s talk about the one state that saw an increase. it is kansas. the only state that saw an increase in the number of uninsured. it is up from 12.5% to 14.4%. kansas is among the 16 states that did not expand medicaid and only rely on the federal exchange. it would be very interesting, by the way watching this court case, if the supreme court
marketplace or ran in exchange in partnership with the federal government. and also, guess what, all but new mexico had democratic governors too in 2014. think there is not a partisan impact on this? but it is a different story in the states with the smallest drops in the uninsured rate. of the bottom ten in this category. more of a bipartisan mix. lots of republican legislative control. may notice by the way massachusetts on this map. sort of misleading. its drop is small because it had the lowest rate of uninsured for the past seven years due to something called a romney care. meanwhile, let s talk about the one state that saw an increase. it is kansas. the only state that saw an increase in the number of uninsured. it is up from 12.5% to 14.4%. kansas is among the 16 states that did not expand medicaid and only rely on the federal exchange. it would be very interesting, by the way watching this court case, if the supreme court
drops in the uninsured rate. of the bottom ten in this category. more of a bipartisan mix. lots of republican legislative control. may notice by the way massachusetts on this map. sort of misleading. its drop is small because it had the lowest rate of uninsured for the past seven years due to something called a romney care. meanwhile, let s talk about the one state that saw an increase. it is kansas. the only state that saw an increase in the number of uninsured. it is up from 12.5% to 14.4%. kansas is among the 16 states that did not expand medicaid and only rely on the federal exchange. it would be very interesting, by the way, watching this court case, if the supreme court strikes down the subsidies, what do republican governors do, what do republican legislatures do, what does congress do, all of them say they re not going to let these insurance premiums spike and that they will do something temporarily. does that temporary mean they end up making the law more permanent?