Stay updated with breaking news from Roy henry. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
week. but we're also hopeful that the u.s. attorney's office and department of justice will actually do a very thorough and objective investigation and will present evidence in a way we believe is far less affected by the local influences in west chester county that leads to an indictment and criminal prosecution. we should have questions asked and legitimately answered by a legitimate prosecutor. >> mrs. henry, i will wrap up with you on this question. i've talked to you all several times and you all have had plenty of time to think over and see more evidence than most people have. has anything changed in your mind, the attorney for officer hess, they have certainly claimed and that it was actually d.j., your son himself, some of his behavior, led to that incident that night and if he had done things differently, he wouldn't have died. has anything changed in your mind to make you think that your son did anything wrong that night that may have been interpreted by that officer as something threatening and, therefore, the officer had to act the way he did?
mr. and mrs. henry, done roy henry senior and angela henry, thanks for being willing to talk to us here. first of all, both of you say you're not surprised at all by the grand jury's decision not to indict. why? >> not at all, t.j. in fact, we believe that all along this process was designed to get to a no true bill instead of an indictment. we were prepared for that. it would be naive of us to accept that a police department that knows it has both criminal and civil liability to investigate this fairly. their evidence was the evidence used by the district attorney's office who were their inherent conflicts, both that we experienced and that are just inherent in the process. it would be impossible for us to accept that would be a fair and impartial process. >> am i hearing right? it sounds like you're not taking much issue with those people on the jury, the grand jury. it's more so you don't think they were presented with all of the evidence and all of the facts. >> that's right.