Page 4 - Rule 6e News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Do you think you'll see as result? >> well, a couple of things as you know the i think ultimately the house was engaged and is engaged in an inquiry. and therefore under rule 6e had the right to these as the committee did proceed. i think you got the context right at the beginning of the program but it's important for this victory not to be seen through a partisan lens. it's ultimatehy a win for the american people. it was a major victory for the constitution and fundamental rule of law in our country for judge howell to ultimately conclude what we all knew to be true which was the house was e...

Generates more information, even if we already have enough to justify impeachment. but the bottom line is, yes, the answer to your question, an impeachment inquiry is now underway. >> so given that, how does it change the power of the congress to subpoena people? because what we've seen so far is that the house committees subpoena someone in the trump world and they just say no, and they don't show up and then nothing happens. when it's an impeachment inquiry, do they have more power to make people appear? >> absolutely. for one thing a lot of the basis on which they may say no is that there i...

And we're going to see what remedies we can recommend, including possibility of articles or impeachment. we're not limited to that. that's very much the possibility as a result of what we're doing. >> shepard: in other words democrats say it is what you want it to be. there was a report on the topic of grand jury secrecy, which is governed by the federal rules of criminal procedure. in particular, rule 6 e, which states that attorneys, grand jurors and others must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury. except courts have been conflicted on whether congress can get exceptions. n...

Discussion after what happened after the production of our report. >> had the attorney general asked you provide a redacted version of the report? >> we worked on redacted versions together. >> did he ask you for a version with the grand jury material was separated? >> not going to get into details. >> is it your belief an unredacted version of the report could be released to congress on the public. >> that's not within my purview. >> rule 6e material. why didn't you take a similar action so congress could view this material? >> we had a process that we were operating on with the attorney gene...

Issue subpoenas and make people like don mcgahn, hope hicks, and all of the others testify, it would be super charged by the fact that this is an impeachment inqui inquiry. we need here, it is at it's absolute apex when it looks to the possibility of impeaching a sitting officer or president. rule 6e, which we heard so much about, having an exception. so the books would be opened, there would be a transparent public hearing, the public could be finally educated. over 1,000 federal prosecutors say that the mueller report shows criminal obstruction of