Page 7 - Say Wikileaks News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

You released is not true. they went forward with the story on his taxes. is there any difference? >> there is a difference. our material, the public responded to it more than "the new york times." but the editor of "the new york times," she has come out and said that he would do the same thing with wikileak wikileaks. if they had obtained the information, they would publish it. unfortunately, i don't believe that is true. i believe they would selectively may be published, they would not have done what we did which was present the american public everything that we knew. can you just imagine if...

Completely absent from all those statements is wikileaks. totally absent. what is going on? i believe two things are going on. number one, they don't have the evidence that wikileaks is involved in that way. why my confident about that? because there isn't one person in the world and i think it is actually only one who knows exactly what is going on. without publications. and that is me. >> sean: can be saved to the american people unequivocally that you did not get this information about the dnc, john podesta, that you did not get it from russia or anyone associated with russia? >> over the l...

Media collusion is they were exposed as using racial language. being anti-somatic, homophobic, which led to on the eve of the democratic national convention, she was fired. that to me was the type of thing -- if you sort of open a window and things are not often the way the appear. if that now a new reality going forward in terms of if the media is not going to do their job, they are going to be more wikileaks in the future? >> well, i surely hope so. >> sean: he has released classified documents generating extreme controv hey, it's the phillips' lady! there's a more enjoyable way to get your ...

They went forward with the story on his taxes. is there any difference? >> there is a difference. our material, the public responded to it more than "the new york times." but the editor of "the new york times," she has come out and said that he would do the same thing with wikileak wikileaks. if they had obtained the information, they would publish it. unfortunately, i don't believe that is true. i believe they would selectively may be published, they would not have done what we did which was present the american public everything that we knew. can you just imagine if wikileaks had information...

In the justice system, we say that there must be open justice where there is justice. to be judged while trying, before the public. it doesn't happen one media organization is engaged in sweeping things under the rug. >> sean: is it fair to say wikileaks is more interested in impacting the lives of people, not superfluous scandalous lives of big stars? >> we don't publish that. we haven't actually been put in a position where we've had to make that determination. because that's not what we do. most people go to tmc, for example. >> sean: julian assange has not stepped outside the ecuadoran emb...