Security Wasnt Right News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Attack on baghdad: we have an accounting that said it was handled at the middle management level from the department of state and wasn't adhered to. it its not an accounting of why security was not provided, why an ambassador was told know and who told him know. bill: you said the narrative about the attack is most disturbing because people start to believe their government is not being are not coming with them. we've been watching awful the hearings and scandals in washington, this is what we found in a "wall street journal" poll. does the i.r.s. skraourt plea of conservative groups raise a q...

Bill: there are new concerns over white house credibility when it comes to the benghazi terror attack. a new poll shows a majority of people, 5 #% say the whit 53% say the white house is mostly hiding something related to the attack. general jack keane, retired four-star general re, vice cheech of the army and a fox news military analyst among many other things. good to see you. nine months later can you explain this? >> it's outrageous. we still don't have a full accounting of why the security was not right, why ambassador stevens' request for security went unanswered, why the leaders of the ...

Martha: it has. we want to talk to chris wallace about, anchor of "fox news sunday." good morning, chris. >> good morning, martha. martha: there was a lot of discussion about a few words. the original release from "the new york times" said the administration has lost all credibility. then they went back apparently and added, they've lost all credibility on this issue, which softened the blow a little bit. your thought first of all on that? >> actually it's more precise, i think it makes more sense, you know, you're not talking about everything this president has done, you're talking about this...

Administration. with the addition of those words on this issue it's very stringing. they basically are saying this it's damage just when any president, either party, liberal or con e conservative has too much power and in the name of security uses it to spy on all of us and they are keeping true to their basic principle on it. at least they are, consistent. martha: let's take a look at another piece of the editorial because it does back up this notion, as you say. this sort of tracking can reveal a lot of personal and intimate information an individual to casually permit to surveillance fundam...

Of the senate. now he's speaking as president of the united states and he's the guy who is on record as being responsible for our national security and i think that he has, you know, an obligation to protect us and he feels this is necessary. and he's got the legal right to do it, martha. i mean he can legally do it and it's an extension of a policy that was put in place under president bush. i don't think that there is question when you look at this thaeup it's a different position being taken by the same guy. martha: which we do see between candidates and folks when they become president. it...