Self Serving Hearsay News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Defendant in such glowing terms. >> mark o'mara took a gamble. >> he did say in the pretrial depositions there were no material inconsistencies. and he also, and to paul's point, they never had to introduce any of those things. that's what we've said here. all of that -- that was a defense lawyer's dream. i fight in every case to get my client's statement in and it's self-serving hearsay. you can't get it in. the prosecution can, because they're the adverse party. at every step of the way, and paul also says they should have concentrated on the law. remember the argument i had with sunny about...

Decision that was. >> it was not only a bad decision to do it, they knew, because they had pretrial depositions that their lead investigator was going to say he didn't think those differences were material. >> i was told that in the pretrial depositions, he was not quite as favorable to the defense. he didn't speak about the defendant in such glowing terms. >> mark o'mara took a gamble. >> he did say in the pretrial depositions there were no material inconsistencies. and he also, and to paul's point, they never had to introduce any of those things. that's what we've said here. all of that -- t...

What does it prove? i don't know. i mean, that she's weird. the defense could say, look is this someone who looks like a premeditated murderer, she is obviously emotionally damaged in some watch the prosecution could say you well it shows that she is a heartless -- heartless killer. i just think this is a good function for the judge to say, you know what, this will just confuse issue, confuse the jury, keep it out. >> mark, you agree with that? >> i think just from an evidentiary standpoint, i don't know who tried to get it in, but my guess is if the prosecutor tried to get it in the judge wou...

Her head. >> you know, i think the judge was right to keep it out because what does it prove? i don't know. i mean, that she's weird. the defense could say, look is this someone who looks like a premeditated murderer, she is obviously emotionally damaged in some watch the prosecution could say you well it shows that she is a heartless -- heartless killer. i just think this is a good function for the judge to say, you know what, this will just confuse issue, confuse the jury, keep it out. >> mark, you agree with that? >> i think just from an evidentiary standpoint, i don't know who tried to get...

sandusky until just this week. as the trial was going on, he apparently approached prosecutors and told them that his adopted father did molest him. jason carroll, cnn contributor and sarah gannon. jason, if matt sandusky's claims was known by the prosecution, why didn't they call him to testify? >> well, i think it's a good question. i think there's a question in terms of whether or not his testimony would have been admissible, for one reason, jerry sandusky is not charged with sexually abusing his son. i can tell you this. think of this scenario. let's say for example jerry sandusk...