Stay updated with breaking news from Settling hundreds. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The cps has not turned to the police and said start investigating again. they are not interested. they do not believe there is anything like enough evidence. if the allegations are true, why aren t the police investigating this? i think the difficulty was that after the trial of rebecca brooks and andy coulson, etc, ithink the publicjust lost the appetite for it and therefore the cps also lost appetite for it as well. it is disappointing that the police don t take it further, given the evidence that has come to light since, but it s a decision for them. people on the other side would just say this is just proof that the evidence is flimsy and does not mean anything. if that was the case, why would newsgroup be settling hundreds of claims in the last ten years for millions and millions and millions of pounds if it was just flimsy ....
Don t take it further, given the evidence that has come to light since, but it s a decision for them. people on the other decision for them. people on the other side decision for them. people on the other side would - decision for them. people on the other side would just - decision for them. people on the other side would just say j the other side would just say this has the other side would just say this has proved the evidence is flimsy this has proved the evidence is flimsy and does not mean anything. if flimsy and does not mean anything- flimsy and does not mean an hinu. . anything. if that was the case, why would anything. if that was the case, why would newsgroups - anything. if that was the case, why would newsgroups be - why would newsgroups be settling hundreds of claims in the last ten years the millions and millions and millions of pounds if it was just flimsy evidence that did not mean anything? evidence that did not mean an hint? , ., , , anything? newsgroup news ....
Say this is just proof that the evidence is flimsy and does not mean anything. if that was the case, why would newsgroup be settling hundreds of claims in the last ten years for millions and millions and millions of pounds if it was just flimsy evidence that did not mean anything? newsgroup newspapers are now fighting to bring an end to the waves of civil litigation against them. at the end of 2022, they asked the courts to strike out two high profile claims arguing that the alleged unlawful activity happened too long ago. one is the case of prince harry, the other is of hugh grant. the press should have massive power. they are such an important pillar of democracy. they need to be there to hold power to account. where there is a genuine public interest, i think the press should be given enormous license, ....