Page 6 - Sham Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Murder didn't pick who went on as the republicans, he already had the report done by two different committees. to main questions, why was the capital so ill prepared for tha day when they knew on december 14th they had a problem . and what have we done to make sure that never happens again? pelosi has created a sham process. unless she reverses course, it seems all five republicans will not participate. we think it's too important, that those two questions, why were we ill prepared, why did they know on december 14th, why would they jeopardize the lives of the capital police. we will run our o...

Concerned by the very small some theoretical exercise, it's crack in the republican wall because those of us running for office and believe in the cause with senator murkowski which need your help to drive home the we'll see if that crack grows message that we are fighting for but also comforted by comments you, not the other side. >> let me give jyosi the last of mitch mcconnell or lindsey word, because there is a guy graham that they are going to be named adam jefferson, who i'd love to have on the show, but coordinating with the white house through the entire senate he's a tough booking, bu...

Do you think schumer is opening up a pandora's box when he talks about call these witnesses? >> no, to your earlier point, it's right and appropriate for democrats to call witnesses because you never know what you'll find. just think in the last few days we had a revelation in terms of the emails and documents from omb. so the longer this sort of plays out, the more opportunity i think democrats and schumer in particular has to unearth more information that becomes relevant and that may take the form of people actually coming to testify. it fits the president's narrative more than schumer's na...

Testify, if any. if they had left it in the house and waited to vote on articles of impeachment until that process could be flushed out in the judicial branch, and of course president trump would comply with the due judicial branch orders. he absolutely has the right and privilege to exert executive privilege and that's what's going on here. it's not obstruction commits the process being played out. i don't think we can reasonably say that the republicans are being hypocritical here, this is all the fault of the democrats because they are just wanting to push this through a sham process. they ...

Their background, but one of the things the judge asks each and err one of them, okay, you put it all aside and just focus on the evidence? why should it be any different for our senators? why shouldn't they be able to put aside their party view and listen to the evidence? also, you're only going get that way if you're actually able to present evidence. a trial without evidence is an absolutely toothless charade. right? it's nothing for the senators to actually dig into vote on. so they need both evidence and absolutely like you said, they should be able to take the same standard as a regular ...