Page 8 - Sharing Evidence News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

To come forward into the courtroom, as well, and then allowed other women who also accused donald trump, of the 26 women who accused donald trump, allowed two of the women into the courtroom, the judge allowed quite a lot of evidence and allowed e. jean carroll's lawyers to build quite a case. i'm not sure donald trump did favors in the deposition. >> the "she's not my type" line is suggesting that rape is about attraction, but it's not, it's about power. meanwhile, donald trump has more trouble in new york. the judge presiding over trump's case in new york barred the former president from p...

About what the results he wants to see coming out of this war in ukraine, so we obviously don't want that to happen. just haven't seen any indication of it. the took the major step of putting out an arrest warrant for president putin for war crimes. in december, john and you know you well know this congress changed longstanding legal restrictions to now allow the united states to better help the with its investigations and prosecutions as it relates to the war in ukraine. the new york times is reporting, though, and i've had many conversations with folks about this now that the pentagon is sti...

With that said i don't think it would be radically different because there are certain facts that have to be the same and as we know they are sharing information and they are sharing evidence. we have to assume that there while not a necessarily in -- ballpark and saying timeframe because otherwise it wouldn't make sense they're giving information if they were on totally different timeframes given the overlap it seems that is reasonable to assume that it's around the same timeframe. >> we will see. we are glasgow professor rebecca roiphe former assistant district attorney for the manhattan da'...

They would be radically different, because there are certain facts that have to be the same. and as we know, they're sharing information and they're sharing evidence. and so we have to assume that they're while not necessarily in lockstep, around the ballpark same time frame, because otherwise it wouldn't really make sense, they're giving and sharing information, if they were on totally different time frames. given the overlap, it seems at least reasonable to assume that it's around the same time frame. >> we will see. new york law school professor rebecca roiphe, thank you so much for your ti...

They would be radically different, because there are certain facts that have to be the same. and as we know, they're sharing information and they're sharing evidence. and so we have to assume that they're while not necessarily in lockstep, around the ballpark same time frame, because otherwise it wouldn't really make sense, they're giving and sharing information, if they were on totally different time frames. given the overlap, it seems at least reasonable to assume that it's around the same time frame. >> we will see. new york law school professor rebecca royphe, thank you so much for your ti...