Live Breaking News & Updates on Shouldnt The Public
Stay updated with breaking news from Shouldnt the public. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Have divulged what clearly at least mr. rosen and some others, clearly divulging this because they are alarmed at the pressure campaign they were under. you have seen these folks behind closed doors. shouldn t the public see this? we have a credibility problem thanks to the former president. shouldn t the public see these folks under oath telling this story to the american public? yes, absolutely. it s really telling stuff, and when you consider that these were trump appointees, people willing to go right to the chalk line and in my slew even over it, when those folks saw this as outlandish and illegal and something that they d call quit before they d participate in, that shows how berserk this had gotten. and with that question, we then go on to the further question of, okay, how was this organized? was this really one little guy in the department of justice with a wild idea? i doubt it. how about bill barr. he resigned. that resignation to me looks ....
False, demonstrate it. that answer was a dodge, a dodge to the question is the very thing nunes is trying to shield the president from, trying to dig up dirt on the bidens in ukraine. in reality, if the story from lev parnas attorney is true, wouldn t that be election meddling? the republican talking point during the impeachment hearings, as you know, is that democrats just withheld valuable information that would have helped the public to assess the credibility of the witnesses. that s why they said they wanted to call hunter biden for example. so did nunes have his own conflict of interest, and if so, shouldn t the public have known just how big of an interest he might have had in pushing a false narrative that ukraine meddled back in 2016? shouldn t the public have been informed of that? i mean the impeachment inquiry comes down to questioning the president s motivation in ....
Conflict of interest, and if so, shouldn t the public have known just how big of an interest he might have had in pushing a false narrative that ukraine meddled back in 2016? shouldn t the public have been informed of that? i mean the impeachment inquiry comes down to questioning the president s motivation in ukraine. shouldn t we perhaps now question nunes motivation? these are questions congressman nunes promised he would go back on television and answer. don t the american people deserve at least that level of transparency? lavish praise on his way out the trump administration door from energy secretary rick perry. take a listen to this. mr. president, i know there are people that say, you know, you said you were the chosen one. and i said you were. but the thing is he s not the only one saying that sort of thing. how republicans are amping up their devotion to president trump, next. what s the nfl s competitive edge? ....
I can t defend how senator feinstein handled it. but the way the president at the time handle it is very different, and that s a key pivotal difference here. because president obama took the memo which was sent to him from the intelligence committee and asked the dni to run a process. this is being rushed out of the door. look, the pres dependent we re making is there s no precedent exactly for this in terms of how trump is handling this. and the question of does it matter if devin nunes was involved in the white house drafting, of course it matters. he s been a witting or unwitting puppet of the white house. but this is memo the president has said he think will impact the russia investigation. even if it won t, this is an intentional misleading of the public. and that s a precedent that s very dangerous to be setting in ....
Requires outside supervision. the public has a right to know about it. so you re saying it s about educating the public. shouldn t the public be fully educated and hear what the democrats, what their problems with this memo are? i mean if it s really about educating the public, why not release both these memos at the same time? well, first of all, the work on this has been going on for quite some time. the democratic memo is much newer. but after does that matter? the members of the house i think it does matter. the members of the house have an opportunity as hundreds of them unveiled themselves with the majority memo, have an opportunity to review the minorities memo. and after sources and methods are carefully addressed and removed from the memo, then i think that the committee should. but, again, i ll have to leave it to the intelligence committee to decide. ....