Live Breaking News & Updates on Sikhing A Judicial Decision

Stay updated with breaking news from Sikhing a judicial decision. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Transcripts For MSNBCW Katy 20240704

Thats the center of jack smiths case. Donald trump is not being prosecuted for lying. Hes being prosecuted for the deliberate and criminal steps he took alongside his six coconspirators to stay in the white house and the quote, unlawful means they pursued to subvert the results in several key states. After the election, in michigan, the indictment noting this, in a private oval office meeting, with the States Senate majority leader, donald trump raised a false claim of an illegitimate vote dump in detroit. The Senate Majority leader told trump that he, quote, had lost michigan, not because of fraud, but because the defendant had underperformed with certain voter populations. Prosecutors then say trump brought his false vote dumping claim to his ag, who told the former president what happened in michigan was, quote, the normal vote
U S , Eugene Robinson , Ana Cabrera , Andrea Mitchell , Jack Smith , Coverage Of Trump , Yasmin Vossoughian , Katy Tur , Donald J Trump , Special Counsel , Co Conspirators , White House , Majority Leader , Oval Office , Voter Populations , Counting Process , His Ag , Vote Dump , Made A , Rudy Giuliani , Co Conspirator , Is Corrupt , On December 7th , December 7th , Michigan Legislature , Joint Resolution ,

Transcripts for MSNBC Katy Tur Reports 20240604 19:12:00

Hundred times in the 45 pages and within this indictment saying this, on january 1st, the defendant called the vice president and berated him because he had learned the vice president had opposed a lawsuit teak sikhing a judicial decision that at the certification the vice president had the authority to reject or return votes to the states under the constitution. the vice president responded that he thought there was no constitutional basis for such authority and that it was improper. in response, the defendant told the vice president you are too honest. does this in fact prove the intent that the former president knew what he was doing was wrong but he did it anyway? yeah, when you tell somebody they re too honest when they object to your plan what does it say about you? an admission i m dishonest? i think that s the way i read that. no one piece of evidence is dispositive of any issue because a jury has to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. but if you look at all the ....

Vice President , Sikhing A Judicial Decision , On January 1st , January 1st , Beyond A Reasonable Doubt ,