Stay updated with breaking news from Slam dunk cases. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
the focus of tonight s the angle. donald trump lawyer paid off a porn star before the 2016 election, democrats inferred trump had intent to falsify records. they did not care the president ordered it himself. trump was guilty before the jury was enpanelled. how different their approach is with their demagogue dr. anthony fauci. although never officially charged with a crime, he had a senior adviser who found himself in hot water recently. he deleted e-mails and helped keep evidence secret. when the good doctor was asked about supporting this guy, we know he received federal grants for his work with the wouhan la. i may have discussed him because he is a grand you made that up, you are testifying he made that up? excuse me. you are testify ing the doctr made that up. i don t know where he got that, that is not true. laura: democrats were outraged dr. fauci were asked questions at all. dr. fauci, we owe you an apology for the way we have raked you throug ....
angle. laura: when donald trump s lawyer paid off a porn star before the 2016 election. democrats were quick to inary trump himself had the intent to falsify records. they didn t care that hush money payments aren t illegal or that the president didn t himself order invoices to be labeled as legal expenses, which i still contend is entirely reasonable by the way. but, in their small minds, trump was guilty before the jury was even impaneled. laura: how different their approach is demagogy anthony fauci. although he has with every charged with a crime he too had a senior adviser who found himself in major hot water recently. emails revealed he deleted records and even used back channels to help dr. fauci keep evidence secret. but when the good doctor is asked about this specifically on the efforts to evade foia requests and protect this guy named peter daszak how may remember we know he received federal grants for his work with the wuhan lab. fauci was all denials. ....
Deferred prosecution deal on the gun charge, take away the irs charge and any other federal crimes brought by the united states. they were willing to give him a free pass on everything, including influence pedalling by foreign government. that got unwound by this judge. as former prosecutor, attorney general of missouri, gun charges are usually slam dunk cases. federal government wanted to get rid of all this stuff and combine that with what happened to president trump, two tiers of justice. one for chief political rival, president trump, they want to put him away, versus a sw sweetheart deal for his son. will we be constitutional republic or banana republic? laura: two judges involved in this case are trump appointees, ....
Prosecution charge on the gun charge. take away the irs charge on the plea deal. and any other federal crimes that might be brought by the united states. so they were willing to give him a free pass on everything, including the influence peddling by foreign governments. but that got unwound by this judge. and so, look, as a former prosecutor here, as the attorney general of missouri. these gun charges are usually slam dunk cases, remember the federal government wanted to get rid of all of this stuff in the sweetheart deal. you combine that what w. what just happened one business day ago frump on full display. two tiers of justice one for the chief political rival president trump. they want to put him away for the rest of his life versus the sweetheart deal for their son. this is now not just about the election about two men. this is about a cause and whether or not we are goings ton a constitutional republic or a banana republic. the two judges that would be involved in this case are ....
It s prioritizing violent crime. really? as of yesterday, overall crime in the districts of 23% murders, up 19%. common sense understands that excepting only slam-dunk cases looks better on prosecutors resumes making it easier to get promoted. unless of course the goal is to promote safety. well, gwyneth paltrow s legal team called the man suing her over 2016 ski crash back to the witness stand and his answers were somewhat enlightening. here is nate foy appeared nate foy. day seven of the gwyneth paltrow ski accident trial, the man suing her for $300,000 took the stand. what changes did you see and perceive following the ski collision? i just found that it was like flipping a switch. like it was the right side and now i m in the dark side. to speak the speaker retired ....