of course he wants to fire the inspector. that s predictable. oh, i didn t know that. is that a shock, alfonso? you don t defend this, right? nochlt if the report is correct. i think it s correct. i have no way of knowing. fair. i think that s fair. i ll say this. this is the way he responds. we ended up with a special counsel because he ended up firing comey. he has to be careful. he can really create a bigger problem than he has right now by firing this inspector general. where are the republicans on this? the fact that donald trump is saying i want to fire the independent voice. in fairness it s only been let s not presume their response just yet. okay. it just popped. we ll see what happens tomorrow. republicans continuously give
mr. president let me end on golan heights. you tweeted about this today in israel. you said it s time for the u.s. to recognize israel s sovereignty and the golan heights. why now? i ve been thinking about doing it for a long time. it s been a hard decision for every president. it s not about netanyahu s re-election? nochlt i wouldn t even know about that. i wouldn t even know about that. i hear he s doing okay. i don t know that he s doing great right now. i hear he s doing okay. whoever is against him i would imagine is also in favor of what i just did. every president has said do that. i m the one who gets that done. of course, so many lies to sort through there. of course he knows that benjamin netanyahu is in the middle of a campaign, a guy facing indictment, who is actually putting pictures of donald trump next to him in the treats of israel, using trump as part of his campaign.
carefully consider the evidence in a trial that would commence in the senate, i think the american people would support impeachment. anything short of that, i agree with jim comey, may look too political and too partisan to the american people. happening in a much more rapid-fire way are disclosures that are big are coming out for all of us to see. any way for you to tell what robert mueller has? nochlt going back some three years or more telling me interviews where people were lying and mounds of data where you re getting financial information, travel information, phone information are piling up. i would have thought this would have shut down last summer. that said, i don t know how many more interviews you have to conduct. from a few weeks ago, documentation from the president that answers questions. that, to me, suggests we re getting into end game. you don t go to the key player in the investigation until you
they will nochlt let us sell to them and export to them. we are the most competitive economy in the world. a rooenl poll just said we bolted back in first place and the fastest growing economy. laura: but the tariffs are going to ruin it all. that s what they are saying. i would like to see a level playing field. president trump in his heart is a lovely playing field and flee trade guy. let s clear away. the whole world trading system by the way has been broken for years and the presidents that have gone down the road and never done anything. in 1990 china s economy is small as the side of italy. and now it is ten times the size of japan. fair trading and free market capitalism will beat the chinese. i give the president a lot of high marks.
secretary in a tough position. she then has to figure out which side am i going to be on. i think the president needs a communications director. i think this government and white house needs a working relationship with the media to make sure that the truth is being given to the american people about a lot of issues. sarah sanders says there s no coordination between what giuliani says in his interviews and the white house. let me come to this element. when he was added to the team back in late april, giuliani told dana bash that his role, and he used this work, ironically now, limited, to interfacing with the mueller team. that doesn t really require him to be on television, right? nochlt and for the most part where he really erred here was going into government policy and administration policy. it has nothing to do with the case and the team that he s on. he s not a government lawyer in this particular situation. he should not be speaking on behalf of the government. look, how lon