Page 11 - State Exchanges News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Up state exchanges. whether that was a balloting for the irs to do or not. but they say would be too expensive for them otherwise the government has made a way for them to be able to pay for it. it says in the law that subsidies would only go into states where exchanges had been set up. jonathan gruber himself had said that repeatedly. these justices are leaning to the left and are very much in support of the government, so we kept our eyes were what this makes all the differences here. were they are voting to uphold obamacare. and anthony kennedy the swing justice. both of them are very close...

Crucial part of it. you need all three of them to be able to work. it has already been held up constitutionally by the supreme court, and this is another attempt to get rid of the law. >> as the u.s. has interpreted the statute as it understands it, the language says the subsidies go where state exchanges have been set up. so people will argue for that plain segment by itself, and then there's elizabeth who will say, that's not how the law was intended to work. there would be great incentives for them to set it up and they didn't calculate the backlash for states that didn't. >> these taxes ar...

They could say obamacare doesn't have the funding for the subsidies because they can't have subsidies because they don't have state exchanges. al they could give us a right for emergency equality. they could undermine the president on the executive orders. they could say you overreached you can't make immigration law. you create roadblocks to the prosecution if they're here illegally. that's writing law. maybe we'll go back to the end of the summer where they have to lisk with each other. it's almost like they choose eruption and chaos over agreeing to live with each other. pelosi could have g...

Out to a looming supreme court decision that could undo obamacare. let's bring in karl rove former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to president george w. bush, also a fox news contributor. responding to questions from senator hatch she admits that if the supreme court invalidates obamacare -- invalidates the legality of those state exchanges -- there is no plan to control the chaos that would result. what do you think about that just from a standpoint of governance karl? >> well, i think it's two things. first of all, i think it is a direct message to the courts that if you hold that ...

The state exchanges. >> this is going to be decided in march or june. so just to james' potential we are heading into a big part as indicating a rule of law. >> as opposed to overreach. >> exactly. so what they might do is toss this into congress saying, here's this problem, you created it, you passed a bad law. now the political branch -- it's going to be up to republicans, incumbent on the republicans to offer a pragmatic alternative to inkrees increase that agenda. i think what's going to happen before the supreme court decides on this case much more as we preview the stories to watch in 20...