Page 41 - State Use News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

To do is to require that every state use voters rather than people. and up until now it's actually the supreme court in the 1960s did not specify that you had to use people rather than voters but almost every state did. at the time there were four or five states using voters rather than people. and to this day almost every state uses people rather than voters. so for the court to actually take that step and side with the plaintiffs and say texas and other states can only use voters really would be a remarkable step, not only a violation of precedent but public policies as it exists today. >> a...

Wouldn't have gotten elected in 1992. however, there are some fundamental matters. 2004, i think the campaign made a difference. '76 was a big one. about four won that election. it was down by a ga still john. this was one of those elections where it's going to matter that the campaign -- the candidate performance is going to matter. we do not know right now who's going to win this election. i can't sit here and say, you know, obama's going to win. >> right. just because it's so close. >> so close and you have the competing dynamic of -- the political scientists -- one thing i know, if you tal...

Republicans in that state were against the bailouts and that surprised me but it was what it was, and, it reinforced and lengthened the president's lead over mitt romney in that state, assuming michigan, then, tips to the president again as it did four years ago. it could be the same deal here, it is enough to drain his support among all voters in the state just enough to tip ohio, a crucial state use know to the president come november. here is the deal. >>guest: romney is about what we have right now and a lot of people or, blah, he doesn't excite me but he is the guy that we think, or most ...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.