Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20180224:21:40:00
And if you're a trump supporter, you go away feeling that he's been vindicated, without really understanding even what the argument is actually about. then the other track is the one that's way down in the weeds. it's like, well, was the steele information the whole application or just a tiny piece of it? was the court told that his research was commissioned by someone with political motive against trump? or were they led to believe it was neutral information? why was this yahoo news article included? was it to corroborate steele even though we now know steele was its source? or is it for some...