Page 48 - Substantively News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Administration in the form of the members of the house and the senate as well as in the white house itself, have not put forward. as a counter narrative. the underlying facts remain untestified to by the trump team. they've not challenged the accuracy of the call between the president and zelensky. in fact, when you saw today, congressman collins and then others were repeatedly asked about, was it a good call, was it a perfect call? they would not answer that question. >> what does that tell you? >> it tells me that it wasn't a perfect call and they know it. and they know that substantively, a...

Take our notes and participate in discussion, substantively, though. mr. trump did nothing wrong. each and every action of the president has been explained. we have offered the basis, the understanding. we've gained an understanding for why a president would have reasonable concern about ukraine, why a president would have specific concern about this biden/burisma nexus. you haven't heard any defense of burisma. you haven't heard them all say this is all bogus, the president should not have been asking this question. we have cited in the record testimony like george kent who said there were de...

Speak for sort of i guess editing a bill. except this isn't any ordinary bill coming out of judiciary committee. it is an indictment of the president of the united states. >> yeah. that's right. and i wouldn't expect to see any edits actually taking place. yeah. you had the matinee today of the ig hearing. tonight, starting around 7:00, you'll have the start of this markup. it'll stretch over two days. and, yeah, democrats, ultimately, whose resolution this is, don't anticipate there being any substantive changes to the document that was released yesterday. but what a markup process does allow...

Of this. bill, we've got a lot to get to here. the third piece of this is what we're learning about the actual case and the actual articles. and it was very interesting today in another exchange with reporter, garrett haake, pelosi not wanting to speak to the big question of other alleged obstruction. take a look. >> do you want to see elements of the mueller report or these other -- >> i'm not going to talk about that. i'm not going to talk -- my chairman will be making recommendations. >> do you have a personal view on that? >> as to what the -- our counsel, our lawyers, our chair, the staff...

That. they're just going to go straight to it. now there is a pretty good argument. maybe they want to actually take a little more time, try and force these subpoenas to come out in court. it does seem like the administration has been acting like they have something really to hide. >> what do you think is key substantively that should come out of wednesday's judiciary hearing? >> i think wednesday's judiciary hearing is going to be four constitutional law experts, three of whom are democratic selections who are presumably going to say this is impeachable conduct, and one a republican who won't...