Stay updated with breaking news from Surveilled russia. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
people were unmasked, it was leaked. the fact that that was leaked, that is improper. i agree with you. that those who would leak information probably broke the law. they should be investigated too. tucker: what is this about? we all assume that it we know russia hacked the election. i am just asking you why it s not one person, not one, every single night characterized what exactly that means? i m getting very frustrated. i don t know what it means to hack in election. i do know what they did that they would constitute spying on the trump campaign. it s because they leaked those dnc emails out to impact the election. tucker: why want all of our intelligence agencies director comey has said that. tucker: actually you can answer this question. i asked the ranking democrat of ....
Ask real questions because i have learned in 30 years here don t take it on faith, get the facts. i am waiting for a single fact. just one from any of these fabled 17 intelligence agencies. maybe the coast guard can give me this one scintilla of evidence that the russian government of vladimir putin broke into john podesta s email emails. for the expressed purpose of we need a special commission to investigate a neutral, fair commission. why wouldn t you agree with that? don t you believe this is important? i know you don t get happened but tucker: i am merely saying if we are going to destroy the lives of people and surveilled american citizens, we are going to break the basic bond of trust, watching me without my knowledge. because we need to get to the bottom of this russian thing. i m asking for one person to give me one piece of evidence that this russia thing actually happened. and nobody will. ....
Considering what we just learned about national security advisor under barack obama susan rice. rice went on television andd lied. she said she knew nothing about the intelligence collection on donald trump and his associates. she knew quite a bit about it as it turns out. she participated in the monitoring of the trump campaign and transition. many of the communications she and the obama administration monitored were unrelated in the investigation into russia. an investigation that is as of today the only excuse offered for the monitoring. what exactly were the obama s doing spying on the trump people? monitoring the conversations of your political opponents and trampling measures to protect their identities is notpl incidental collection. ....
Officials that were not unmasked but certain ones were unmasked. tucker: i ve heard this explanation from the very beginning. this is what we do, it s totally cool. wouldn t you want someone someone inside the obama white house, susan rice, to say wait a second, this guy is running a campaign, a republican for president. maybe we should pull back. it is being reported tonight byi sara carter at circa that her interest in the surveillance began in july when he got the nomination. that looks political to me. you are insinuating that s why susan rice did this. tucker: why would you be unmasking the names of people in the campaign against her preferred candidate? we know russia was engaging in hacking in the u.s., interfering with the election. ....
Of the fbi that there is an ongoing criminal investigation of the trump campaign and the cooperation between trump officials and russia. there could be a very good reason for this unmasking. tucker: there might be. is there a good reason for the spying that had nothing to do with the russia investigation? it encompassed a lot of surveillance of trump and his associates. what could possibly be the justification of that? we don t know that. that hasn t come out. tucker: fox news is reporting that. a lot of this material had nothing at all to do with that at russia investigation. again, in the middle of a presidential campaign, when you have one party which is seeking to defeat another party for the party in power to use the capacity against the other party seems way out of balance, legal or not. tucker, we have to look at each surveillance in the commune ....