Vimarsana
Biggest News Aggregation in the World

Taging Out News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Taging Out. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Taging Out Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:39:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:39:00

Player, or a scientist is it worth it? >> i don't think amy chua is mommy dearest. some of her methods is too strict but she talks about being a chinese mother is not necessarily being chinese. she said she's met many ghanaians, jamaicans and others of cultured nations that are, quote/unquote chinese mothers. the nation suffer bass they don't push their children. i think you make a mistake when you say it's okay to be second or third. why not be first? who wants to be second? i am. >> score one for the tiger mom. >> everyone's a winner in our household. >> do you give trophies? >> even if you ...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:09:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:09:00

One at senior levels in american history. the point i was trying to make is you can draw a line, particularly in the certain kind of use of metaphors, killing, murdering, taging out, which is another one that michele bachmann used in one of her statements. sharron angle's now infamous comment about second amendment remedies to deal with the problem of harry reid, her opponent. that's what we have to think about. to we really want to continue to use that kind of language at these levels or should there be kind of a social sanction, not a legal one, but a moral sanction the way we've stopped usi...

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:23:00 - Vimarsana News

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20110121:00:23:00

Helping out hamas. nobody has any evidence that it had anything do with the groups that attacked us with al qaeda. so he uses that mushy language of weapons of mass destruction, perfect lingo of "the new york times" and then he throws in this tactile -- what does this mean? you go to war because somebody's tactically involved with some regional groups and it's an arab country? big surprise. there's a lot of countries involved tactically with terrorists and you don't go to war with them. so what kind of bs is he shoveling at us now, my question to you, chris cillizza, nonpartisan chris cillizza...