Page 34 - Tech Platforms News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Legally speaking. the change is unlikely to come from members of congress but rather the score. two cases to the high court challenged 230 the law that shields social media companies from getting sued over third party content on their site. one suit that scotus will take up accuses youtube's ago chrisms of spreading terror wrist content and that youtube didn't do enough to block terrorists from using the platform. >> they've been so focused on basically taking conservatives off the platform they've lost track of terrorist content and we've seen a massive proliferation of extremism concern with...

The context of a legal framework, but then codes of practice and transparency with regulators. and i think that's the way forward with online safety bill. set some clear responsibilities, but then you need to develop policies which will change over time. so would you say the system is working at the moment in terms of protecting people? no, because i think that's, we've done that ourselves, but that's not consistently a standard across the different tech platforms. and we see, you know, twitter in the news and others. so i think there's an importance of having a set of standards for everyone. ...

Different tech platforms. and we see, you know, twitter in the news and others. so i think there's an importance of having a set of standards for everyone. it's also important, i think, that the larger players, the more popular platforms like youtube, have a higher bar because more people are using them every day. and i think that's appropriate. and then when you say you're talking to regulators or you're lobbying, actually what we're trying to do is explaining the kind of thing that i've just talked you through and what we've learned about how technology can help. so i think in a combination ...

How do you decide what is and isn't allowed? it's a free speech world, but is that harmful? so we worked with 150 expert agencies. europol, the home office, institute for strategic dialogue and so on, to come up with some policies to define that. we then trained people to classify videos, and then when they could do it accurately, we trained machines and now we report on how effective that policy is. and i can tell you that 90% of videos that violate that policy never are seen by a single human. so we can do that in the context of a legal framework, but then codes of practice and transparency ...

Is and isn't allowed? it's a free speech world, but is that harmful? so we worked with 150 expert agencies. europol, the home office, institute for strategic dialogue and so on, to come up with some policies to define that. we then trained people to classify videos, and then when they could do it accurately, we trained machines and now we report on how effective that policy is. and i can tell you that 90% of videos that violate that policy never are seen by a single human. so we can do that in the context of a legal framework, but then codes of practice and transparency with regulators. and i ...