Page 114 - Technically It Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Technically it doesn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Technically It Doesn T Today - Breaking & Trending Today

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130622:02:45:00

The permission of the individual or without a judge s warrant targeted toward an individual. my reading of the fourth amendment is our person and our things are ours and only a judicial warrant on probable cause can take them. now, some of the courts for years have said, oh, if you give your records to a bank or a phone company, they re no longer yours. i disagree with those decisions and think they need to be revisited, particularly in this digital age. so technically, yes, they did get a court order. technically, yes, some people in congress approved of this. but really it wasn t widespread and they also lied to congress and said they weren t taking lots of millions of bits of americans information. it turns out they were taking billions of phone call records on daily basis. so them lying us has really developed a credibility gap. you mentioned the line to congress. i assume what you mechbt specifically, correct me if i m wrong, is dna clapper, his ....

Phone Company , Court Order , Wasn T , Weren T , Dna Clapper , Phone Call Records , Credibility Gap ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130619:02:42:00

Enough? senator rand paul joins us. nice to see you, senator. nice to see you, greta. are you satisfied with the response by the general? well, i think your questioning gets to the crux of the problem. is the court order constitutional? is it constitutional for the court to take records without the permission of the individual, without a judge s warrant targeted toward an individual? my reading of the fourth amendment is, our person and our things are ours and only a judicial warrant on probable cause can take them. now, some of the courts, for years have said, if you give your records to a bank or a phone company, they re no longer yours, i disagree with those decisions, and i think they need to be revisited, particularly in this digital age. so technically, yes, they did get a court order. technically, yes, some people in congress approved of this, but really wasn t widespread and they also lied to congress and said they weren t taking lots of ....

Rand Paul , Court Order Constitutional , The General , Phone Company , He Wasn T , Court Order , Weren T ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130619:05:42:00

Enough? senator rand paul joins us. nice to see you, senator. nice to see you, greta. are you satisfied with the response by the general? well, i think your questioning gets to the crux of the problem. is the court order constitutional? is it constitutional for the court to take records without the permission of the individual, without a judge s warrant targeted toward an individual? my reading of the fourth amendment is, our person and our things are ours and only a judicial warrant on probable cause can take them. now, some of the courts, for years have said, if you give your records to a bank or a phone company, they re no longer yours, i disagree with those decisions, and i think they need to be revisited, particularly in this digital age. so technically, yes, they did get a court order. technically, yes, some people in congress approved of this, but really wasn t widespread and they also lied to congress and said they weren t taking lots of ....

Rand Paul , Court Order Constitutional , The General , Phone Company , He Wasn T , Court Order , Weren T ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130617:08:49:00

Law on leaking classified information is murky. technically, it s not against the law to release classified information if it doesn t do any harm. it is illegal to release information that s sensitive and not even classified, if it does do some harm. and so, the justice department has the burden of proving that snowden s release caused some harm. i think they ought to be able to do that. and therefore, it s illegal. but it s very murky. but one thing, again, there is no separation between getting all this surveillance for fighting terrorism, and you ve got national, foreign intelligence. foreign intelligence is going to have nothing to do with crime, nothing to do with terrorism, nothing to do with any it could be negotiating a trade deal, you could get a lot of this information. but once you get it, you say the fbi s not going to look into it but i m asking the question here about who s celebrated, ....

Edward Snowden , Trade Deal ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130617:06:49:00

This capacity? well, all leak eers, and the law on leaking classified information is murky. technically, it s not against the law to release classified information if it doesn t do any harm. it is illegal to release information that s sensitive and not even classified, if it does do some harm. and so, the justice department has the burden of proving that snowden s release caused some harm. i think they ought to be able to do that. and therefore, it s illegal. but it s very murky. but one thing, again, there is no separation between getting all this surveillance for fighting terrorism, and you ve got national, foreign intelligence. foreign intelligence is going to have nothing to do with crime, nothing to do with terrorism, nothing to do with any it could be negotiating a trade deal, you could get a lot of this information. but once you get it, you say the fbi s not going to look into it ....

Leak Eers , Edward Snowden , Trade Deal ,