Terror Prosecution News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

To violate civil liberties in pursuit of a foreign terror organization, that's the same mechanism for political dissent. that's the terra factory and it analyze terror prosecution from 2001 through 2013. at least 50 defendants were on trial because of behavior that the fbi had not only encouraged but enabled. fbi agents were essentially the plotters in these crimes and they made the crimes, crimes. 2012, a writer for the nation found that fbi agents had "crossed the line from merely observing potential behavior which by the way is allowed and good too, and we are quoting, encouraging people an...

Ari, let me start with you here in the studio. again, one of the things that struck me there from mr. ortiz saying that this is not a day for celebration. this is not a day to celebrate. >> in this federal death penalty case it is the jury that decides if dzhokhar tsarnaev should die not the judge. it is then the judge who technically goes through that sentencing process. that appeals process continues. we were just sitting there watching in this press conference, as were a lot of people in the country, when you think about the import of this terror prosecution. the other thing that jumped out...

If they have dna and the dna comes back to her, the last thing she's going to be worried about is whether or not she called after the fact. i mean that is not going to be anybody's worry. she's going to be smack dab in the middle of a terror prosecution on the basis of conspiracy. if she didn't know anything and then learned after the fact, no, she doesn't have any legal obligation. she may have a moral obligation. >> how difficult is it going to prove conspiracy here? i mean either one of you. she lives in a small apartment. yes, she's working all the time. but our understanding is there was ...

The fact. a conspiracy, she loses that spousal privilege. >> i agree with that 1,000%. if they have dna and the dna comes back to her, the last thing she's going to be worried about is whether or not she called after the fact. i mean that is not going to be anybody's worry. she's going to be smack dab in the middle of a terror prosecution on the basis of conspiracy. if she didn't know anything and then learned after the fact, no, she doesn't have any legal obligation. she may have a moral obligation. >> how difficult is it going to prove conspiracy here? i mean either one of you. she lives in ...

Completely different thing. she may have contributed to this conspiracy in some way prior to the fact. a conspiracy, she loses that spousal privilege. >> i agree with that 1,000%. if they have dna and the dna comes back to her, the last thing she's going to be worried about is whether or not she called after the fact. i mean that is not going to be anybody's worry. she's going to be smack dab in the middle of a terror prosecution on the basis of conspiracy. if she didn't know anything and then learned after the fact, no, she doesn't have any legal obligation. she may have a moral obligation. >...