Page 2 - Terrorism Analysis News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Would insist otherwise. nonetheless it is a terrorist organization. they say at that time it was not -- they couldn't be certain that was the case. they at no time want to prejudice the investigation already being launched by the fbi at that time. and that's why that language wasn't used at the time -- >> wait a minute. they put it in the talking points because they believed ansar sharia was involved. then they took it out because they put it in? this doesn't make any sense. it was put in by the intelligence people and then taken out by them? the other thing is, how come all those half dozen t...

>> did he say don't call it a terrorist attack? >> not in so many years but that's clearly the import. >> the language is pretty stark. it says we know extremists with ties to a.q. participated in the attack. which complies -- which implies complicity in the deaths of the american officers. >> that's from this guy who is the director of terrorism analysis. >> that's pretty stark. >> before it was drafted by the analysts. the points were drafted by analysts who said, this is the best information we have now. when it come to what you're going to put out publicly, that's a different type of quest...