Page 3 - Test Out News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And to make sure the actions occurred. and those two things did happen, i went out and i talked to hundreds of local media to make sure that they knew and everybody across this country knew how important testing was, and ensured that the investment kept going and ensured that the people who needed the test most, the tribal nations, together with brett goiroux, we got test out. it is absolutely clear that the president's message and from the very beginning of underplaying this pandemic, and this issue about testing and cases and not seeing that link between the critical relationship of testing ...

The pcr as a test-out, and the rapid test is not 100%. then why did they reduce the isolation period from 10 to 5 days. wouldn't a shorter isolation require a test before you are able to go out into the public? and would you allow a patient to sit next to someone who had just gotten the five-day isolation and is out without a test? would you tell the patient no problem, sit next to them. >> 10 days was too long. have you seen the streets lately? nobody on the streets with 10 days. 5 days is too short without a rapid test. absolutely right. they create a tremendous confusion with this. 5 days t...

The pcr as a test-out, and the rapid test is not 100%. then why did they reduce the isolation period from 10 to 5 days. wouldn't a shorter isolation require a test before you are able to go out into the public? and would you allow a patient to sit next to someone who had just gotten the five-day isolation and is out without a test? would you tell the patient no problem, sit next to them. >> 10 days was too long. have you seen the streets lately? nobody on the streets with 10 days. 5 days is too short without a rapid test. absolutely right. they create a tremendous confusion with this. 5 days t...

The pcr as a test-out, and the rapid test is not 100%. then why did they reduce the isolation period from 10 to 5 days. wouldn't a shorter isolation require a test before you are able to go out into the public? and would you allow a patient to sit next to someone who had just gotten the five-day isolation and is out without a test? would you tell the patient no problem, sit next to them. >> 10 days was too long. have you seen the streets lately? nobody on the streets with 10 days. 5 days is too short without a rapid test. absolutely right. they create a tremendous confusion with this. 5 days t...

Rapid tests regularly, they shortened their time of isolation, and then they used rapid tests. they required people to rapid test out. these guidelines are based on scarcity of rapid tests and leaving them out deliberately. these guidelines would be just fine if we had five days plus rapid testing out. but at this point we're leaving it up to everybody's judgment and it could potentially be a big problem and give us a lot more opportunity for spread of this virus. >> i think all of us probably know somebody who thinks they have it or have had it, and they couldn't get a test. you know, do they...