Page 2 - Testifying Under Oath News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Rupert murdoch, testifying under oath by lawyers. when asked why he did not stop the lies about dominion, the lawsuit is about, said i could have, but i did not. in any other civil case, that would be an admission of liability that the defendant could not survive. but with that admission under oath, the only thing standing here between rupert murdoch and the billion dollar judgment against him in court, it's the first amendment. fox defense so far, it rests entirely on the first amendment journalistic principle that what donald trump was saying about the election was newsworthy, and fox had a ...

Verdict. the conspiracy theorist has been ordered to pay nearly $50 million to single family. jones has repeatedly lied on his media platform that the sandy hook massacre was faked. the truth? 20 children and six adults were killed. here is michael george. >> question number three, 20 million. >> reporter: for the first time far-right conspiracy theorist alex jones is paying the price for his lies about the sandy hook school mesker. a texas jury ordered jones to pay $45 million in punitive damages and 4 million in compensatory damages to the parents of slain 6-year-old jesse lewis. he claimed ...

The 2 the 2020 election. >> between december 23rd and january 3, the president either called me or met with me virtually every day -- >> reporter: testifying under oath, top former department of justice officials told the house select committee investigating the january 6th attack that former president trump relentlessly pressured them to investigate false claims of election fraud. >> we had concluded, based on actual investigation, actual witness interviews, actual reviews of documents, that these allegations simply had no merit. >> reporter: weaving previous interviews with live testimony, c...

And contradicting yourself. he shouldn't be the news. his client should be the news and they should be careful how they advance forward. >> is it possible giuliani is giving the president a reason to demand to testify in order to clarify this? >> well, he's not intentionally giving mueller a reason, of course. but donald trump can clear this up by testifying under oath. there's no doubt about that. i suppose one could also say that the giuliani strategy here is to sew confusion. although it's hard for me to see how that makes a great deal of sense here. you know, i can't disagree with renato. ...

That's how any competent lawyer would act. giuliani in my opinion is not acting as a lawyer but acting as somebody providing a distraction who's probably not even fully briefed by the legal team, who's just going out there and spouting words. and i think he's really doing damage to his client because we're all taking this seriously and dissecting what he says. but there's no strategy in using imprecise language and making news yourself. he shouldn't be the news. his client should be the news and they should be careful how they advance forward. >> is it possible giuliani is giving the president...