Page 26 - Testing Missiles News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Pressure on iran. the other side of the coin, ironian iron iiron -- iranians with the u.s. pulling out of the deal will feel they're absolved from adhering to their -- maybe begin to build up more enriched uranium. everything that the deal is designed to prevent iran from doing. >> it's important to point out they do some things that the u.s. objects to and protests, and that are, in fact, antithetical to u.s. interests. >> absolutely. >> like testing missile, but never part of the deal. they're not -- they were not disallowed under the deal from testing missiles. >> that's right. that was not...

American businesses will be disadvantaged and that tl won't be any real pressure on iran. on the other side, the iranians having pulled out of the deal will feel they're absolved from adhering to their commitments under the nuclear deal. so maybe they'll begin to build up more enriched uranium, everything the deal is to prevent them from doing. >> the objections and protests that are -- >> absolutely. >> -- like testing missiles but they were never part of the deal. they were never disallowed from testing missiles. >> that was not part of the nuclear deal but it's significant. the iranians con...

Phase one is to get through this period of rhetorical escalation. phase two is then to move on to the real problem that i think director pompeo alludes to, which is how to eliminate or control north korea's nuclear ambitions and its program. and then we're going to have to decide among three options. do we want to live with it? we don't want to, but can we live with it and deter them. second, can we accept something less like a freeze in their program or third, do we really want to eliminate it? if north korea continues testing missiles, it will only aggravate the situation. although i must sa...

American citizen. i don't view ignoring guam as viable. any attack on guam is an attack on the united states of america. i think his base would understand that and not default to the position you said. >> guam was only threatened after the president said, if you make more threats, i'll incinerate your country. this didn't begin with guam. this began with north korea testing missiles and apparently having a capacity to miniaturize a warhead. and our president saying, if you threaten, i'll incinerate. and i think that's too bellicose for most americans. >> the president has drawn, a red, purple,...

This is our people. we have military facilities there. we have thousands of soldiers there. they have a governor who is a proud american citizen. so i don't view ignoring guam as viable because any attack on guam is an attack on united states of america. >> of course it is. >> so i think his base would understand that and not default -- >> just for the record, guam was threatened after the president said if you make any more threats i'll incinerate your country. this didn't begin with guam. it began with north korea testing missiles and apparently having the capability of a war head. but our p...