That Rosen News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And says because of the reporter's own potential criminal liability in this matter, we believe that requesting the voluntary production of materials from him would be futile. he specifically goes on to say, this f.b.i. guy, that rosen has potential criminal liability yet holder told you he never even heard of potential prosecution of a journalist for disclosures? >> if that isn't misleading congress, it's minimum, i don't know what is, but even if you accept mr. conyers explanation that holder did nothing wrong he is not in charge of this department. he is lost the trust of congress and i subm...

Has already begun. is that sufficient? >> megyn, its teaching moment because he got caught purely and simply. these warrants were issued in 2011. there was an indictment returned against mr. kim for espionage and rosen was stated in the indictment as an unindicted co-conspirator. he was that because he was simply doing his job. that is what the press is supposed to do. it doesn't make any difference if it's a fox news reporter or somebody on msnbc. the press has got a job to do and it is obvious that rosen was trying to get to the bottom of this. i've been on judiciary committee for my entire ...

To. so i haven't gotten that invitation and james rosen hasn't received it either. check the mail. >> megyn: how many times have you done it. to whom? what is the list. first after the a.p. you said you take it seriously but you couldn't remember how many times you done it. then you did it to rosen and fox news. who else? before we let the healing begin, let's diagnosis the scope of the problem? >> i don't know if you are going, but we'll watch the in-box. >> megyn: i have a message, thank you chris. as we first step in soeflg a problem is admitting there is one. that is what they have to ...

♪ ♪ >> megyn: fox news has obtained a letter from house judiciary committee demanding that the attorney general answer questions, including the question, how can you claim to have never been involved in the potential prosecution of a member of media, but you were admittedly involved in discussions regarding mr. rosen's emails? i had a chance to ask congressman at the top of the hour. watch. >> look at what the f.b.i. alleged, saying he signed off according to the report. number one, there is probable cause to believe that the reporter has committed or is committing a violation of espionage...

According nbc and daily beast. this is what the u.s. attorney alleged the f.b.i. alleged to get the search warrant against james rosen, something holder would have known if he signed off on it. he said i never heard of it happening, look what the f.b.i. alleged to the thing he signed off according to the report. number one, there is probable cause to believe that the reporter, james rosen, is committing a violation of the espionage act. then he goes even further and says because of the reporter's own potential criminal liability in this matter, we believe that requesting a voluntary production...