The D Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> the thugsjfi] and criminals areçócorrupting our justice system, xdhe's rallying his supporters as another legal probe, the special counsel criminal investigation intensifies.e1xdxdr >> i'll talk to trump's attorney joe tacopina and preet bharara. >> your platform should be banned. >> tiktok ceo faces bipartisan ( skepticism that the app may be used for spying by the chinese government. >> has indeed spied on americaná citizens? >> i don't think that spying is the right way to describ"wit. >> can the biden adóilistration ban the most downloaded app on the planet?5a■xdw3lpe1lp...

Jeopardy, in fact, really leaned into it.xd his campaign made witch hunt signs in an effort to be featured prominently behind himá while he was speaking. >> the district attorney of new york under the auspices and direction of the department of q injustice in washington, dc dc, was investigating me for something that is not a crime, not a misdemeanor, not an affair.xdt( i never liked hors]@fñ prosecutorial misconduct is their new tool, and they're willing to use it at levels never used before.t(qñr when they go after me they're going after you. >> just a reminder, the xdfáfá manhattan da ...

Lawyer took out a equityt( loanf his own money, paid money to someone hew3 didn't çóknow, to afford t($130,000 and didn't te the client aboutlp the legal agreement, and it's a freight if that's, in fact, the case.t(ñi >> look, we put in the if, in fact, that is the case.ñ?ayr"$v chuck? >> no, i understand that. so what is it that you've learned about this case that changes your point of view? >> the facts. the facts. that what i just said and i'll repeat it again, that this was personal expenditure and not campaign money. the hypothetical question posedó to me five years ago beforei]t( af...

Office. if there with -- were axd filin obligation, if he'd taken tax obligation, if he'd taken tax money, which he did nopá would be a crime.w3 if he had used campaign funds, we'd have an argument here. this was a personal matter, and -- w3ok >> he called it legal fees th> they weren't. no, it's insane legal retainer ■ and it was legal fees by michael cohen who arranged it with his own money and took out a loan, resolved this without the president knowing and came back is not a bill in four times ou■ the amount and over the course of a year was paid off. what was he supposed to be put in...

Didn't read it in the clip, which, if that is, in fact the d case, when i'mñr answering a hypothetical question without knowing the facts and i will respond how i think appropriate. now what i since learned is that there were no campaign funds used, that there was a legal invoice sent by a lawyer over the course of a year to cover these payments and more, and tze more importantly, that the campaign finance law is clear. bradley smith, former chairman of the fec, has come on and said clearly that there was no u campaign finance law involved here because his personal funds and the expevd9qui be...