Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20190516:19:08:00
To humanitarian-based immigration. i want to point to refugees in particular. in 2017, the united states took in 33,000 refugees. canada, which is 1/10th the size, took in 44,000 refugees. so, there is another side to this, when comparing it to canada, but what part of the comparison makes sense? in other words welcome in your opinion, has it worked for canada and australia in a way that it can work for the united states? >> i can say it's worked in one way, in that immigration to australia, for example, is about double the u.s. rate. and although there are some grumbling slightly at the momen...
Source: archive.org