fable, the media who cried trump. that guy mbert came down the es anmud beat hillary clinton likea the mule she is, the media treated him like hitler 9/11. unlike hillary, he didn t kill anyoneco. russian collusion, let s drink p bleach, the moon landing. accordin g to the media, the walls were always closing in. we got them this time with rob rheiner every week, only thing closing in were meathead s arteries.s. s stick reputation on bringing in them down and if america had to fall to bring down the donald, they were cool, too. trump gets arraigned and they went to 11 and blew out the speakers. they already shot their wad. that is biblical, leviticus.wh they are getting what they wanto and they failed to see they gave trump weapons to fight back by accusing him of so many things that are false. do supporters care and listen? dems think they landed the great white whale and they are the realmoby moby dicks. they lied to and insulted almost everybody and those who keep at it se
fable, the media who cried trump. that guy mbert came down the es anmud beat hillary clinton likea the mule she is, the media treated him like hitler 9/11. unlike hillary, he didn t kill anyoneco. russian collusion, let s drink p bleach, the moon landing. accordin g to the media, the walls were always closing in. we got them this time with rob rheiner every week, only thing closing in were meathead s arteries.s. s stick reputation on bringing in them down and if america had to fall to bring down the donald, they were cool, too. trump gets arraigned and they went to 11 and blew out the speakers. they already shot their wad.
so are you saying starbucks is dumb? they say, no, not at all. in fact, we love starbucks. so what s the over/under on this thing closing? first of all, to even bring a lawsuit, they re going to have an upward battle on this because of parody. what they could argue is trademark delusion. in other words, you know, you re diluting our trademark, our product, by putting the dumb on top. and that they might have a different case on. but you know, the case law is not strong for starbucks. we have things like chewy vouitton, where you had these dog pursing mimicking lui viewn to. this is a little different because it s only just one word in front of the real word. here s what a starbucks spokesperson has said. we re evaluating next steps. while we appreciate the humor, they cannot use our name, which is a protected trademark, which is what you re saying. what s the point of this