Weekly take: Law firm's deadline gaff reminder to tread carefully | Managing Intellectual Property
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Stay updated with breaking news from Trade Mark Rules. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 271 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 277 NOMINAL INDEX EDAC Engineering v. Industrial Fans (India) Pvt Ltd, Application Nos 2080 and 4609 of 2021, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 271 ...
The Madras High Court recently observed that the time limit of two months prescribed under Section 21(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 for filing a counter-statement to a notice of opposition would...
Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 537 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 568NOMINAL INDEXDR SOHAIL MALIK v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 537 Harkirat Singh Sodhi v. Oram Foods Pvt Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del)...
The Delhi High Court has held that when documentary evidence is sufficient for determining the well-known status of a trademark, the filing of evidence by way of affidavit is not mandatory.Justice...