Page 3 - Type Deal News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

But in the end of seeing donald trump potentially getting himself ready to apply more muscle, japan and china may actually try and intervene and get us back into some sort of structure or talks. one of those weird things about this north korea situation right now is that there's no iran type deal on the table. there are no six party talks on the table. the trump administration says it doesn't want to talk. it says talk is over. but you have got to give north korea something to back into. >> you're bringing up president xi and china and leadership in china and in a recent poll of leadership dow...

That was not the referral by the >> well, you know, most of the court. it was for competency, correct? testimony and the details today >> yes. >> competency is different, just showed how heinous this doctor, than sanity at the time crime was, and i agree that this of the act. is it not? just tell me yes or no. >> correct. >> okay. and you put in your report, testimony is used so that the based upon the materials on prosecution can have a sealed review, but you don't outline type deal here and clearly for us what materials did you support on the record why castro actually review. is receiving a...

>> have not called president xi or president putin personally and the reason is because, number one, i shouldn't have to. >> the mainstream media blowing it off as snow big deal. but retired general says it is a very big deal. a cold war scary type deal. general, when we have leaders not talking to each other, in the worst days of the cold war, eisenhower and khrushchev were -- it was clear that john kennedy and nikita khrushchev were, and our relationship with the soviets under ronald reagan -- something is odd. >> strikes me as something is very odd, neil. look, ed snowden goes to first chin...

Turmoil and people in misunderstanding and lack of confidence? why don't we act now? >> okay so he says might as well do it. but you know the republican reason for not doing it now is? >> senate republicans want a deal done. but house republicans are in total chaos. >> why do they want a deal january 3rd or 4th rather than now? >> if all tax rates go up, any deal can be called a tax cut. it's simple like that. if you go over the cliff, anything's a tax cut. >> if you do it now how's it interpreted? >> the interpretation will some primary voters is you danced around on rates. >> or they pass a ...

Interpreted? >> the interpretation will some primary voters is you danced around on rates. >> or they pass a bill cutting taxes continuing the bush tax cuts for under $500,000 a year. something they agree on. >> because of what bob's saying is they're worried some voters are going to look at that -- >> unaware of reality that they would confuse this week with next week in terms of the same results. >> governor norquist agrees with you. but some republicans e spshlly in the house who are unwilling to make the plan "b" type deal. >> but in the end where do you think it's going to end up? 500,000...