Page 31 - Union Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Sexual abuse. the insurance company was trying to pay out $100,000 for the total number of -- for the abuse. the insurance policy said $100,000 for each occurrence in essence. we ruled that the insurance company had to pay $100,000 for each occurrence, each incident of the abuse. therefore, total of $300,000. so in that case, we were ruled and wrote for a victim of abuse against an insurance company that was seeking to squeeze the benefits that were paid under a policy that was owed to the plaintiff in the case. >> then the last one would be united food and commercial workers. >> that's a case...

The total number of -- for the abuse and the insurance policy said $100,000 for each occurrence in essence and we ruled that the insurance company had to pay $100,000 for each occurrence, each incident of the abuse and therefore a total of $300,000. in that case we ruled and i wrote for a victim of abuse against an insurance company that was seeking to squeeze the benefits that were paid under a policy that was owed to the plaintiff in the case. >> then the last one would be united food and commercial workers. >> that's a case, a union case against walmart and the case came from the nlrb and t...

People are saying, this phrase has been used a lot, it is settled law but what we know historically as many settled laws have been revisited and to your fantastic point not necessarily overturned per se on its face but redesigns to have less impact and sometimes no impact but what is your response to the notion of settled law in the united states of america? >> we all have to look back at the experience of neil gorsuch who said in his confirmation hearing last year that he would respect precedent but in his first year on the court he repeatedly ruled to overturn precedent including in a union ...

Jon: the supreme court taking up an important union case. the justices taking up arguments in a case that could force people to join unions. reporter: this pits free speech against compelled union support. a group of teachers in california are suing because even though they aren't members of the union were forced to pay dues. they say that forces them to tritry beaut to a juneon whose ideas they don't agree with. >> i pay for collective

I want to go to judge napolitano i get his reaction first to this union case, what does this mean for them, judge? >> this does not gut some of them as they had hoped a substantial setback for them. a setback for state legislatures the more liberal progressive state legislatures want to force people to join public unions because they can no longer require them to pay dues. they can't require them to pay dues, there is no advantage to forcing them to do so. may i also say i can't help but jumping in on the fact justice alito has written this piece as well as the next one. on this one justice al...