Page 2 - Verifiable Denuclearization News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Let's bring in senator graham. it's gotta to see you this morning. thank you for joining us. >> thank you. a lot to talk about. north korea, my thoughts, the only reason we are moving forward is president trump convinced north korea ehe was serious about them giving up their nuclear program. having the remains returned to the united states is much appreciated by the families in the country as a whole. we are looking for complete irreversible, verifiable denuclearization. china is trying to run the clock out. if i were president trump i would keep the pressure on and be willing to walk away. th...

For it. there's a lot to be done by government and business to protect against cyber. everyone in business has to be concerned. policy. we spoke about policy. we need proper policy. we need proper policy properly executed or year not going to build bridges and tunnels we need. we're not going to get jobs we need. if we don't have proper policy -- america will muddle through but not in the way that we're proud of this place. we won't eliminate income inequality. have the wherewithal to do my negative income tax, to build the bridges, to do these educate the kids. it has to be collaboration. the...

At most, two-year tours. so there's a constant turnover. that's why it's important to do those exercises every year. and of course, this agreement was not very specific on what the administration has been hyping about complete, irreversible, verifiable denuclearization. so i think net gain here, the winners were north korea and china, particularly. the loser, probably the republic of korea and most certainly japan. the bottom line for me is the well-worn cliche is the devil is in the details and to use the phrase the president uses himself is we will see what happens. two unanswered questions ...

Secretary of state mike pompeo, and kelly mentioned it. vertifiable, verifiable denuclearization. donald trump didn't match that goal. his goal was, eh, i'll decide in the first minute if i like him or not. so we now have u.s. policy highly unlikely to be achieved today if ever, and a president who made this all about himself. go figure. >> jeremy bash, our friend steve schmidt talks about the absence of rigor. it's a word he loves, and so do i. was it an absence of rigor that led our president, our side to say "sure, just you and me and the translators in the room. nobody needs to know for po...

Framework. we thought it was a successful agreement. it was in 2002 we found out north korea was cheating on that agreement by separately pursuing uranium enrichment program. it's going to be many years before we know if there's a successful agreement and that's a big if because tonight could just produce a joint statement that's not a real agreement yet. >> there's a new york expression, couldn't hurt. how can a summit make anything worse? how could it make it worse if these two leaders for the first time took their measure of each other? >> it's certainly better than l this preventive strike...