Page 4 - Viability Line News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Means that you are going to get more and more of these individuals who are more ideologically extreme. justice sotomayor's comments on wednesday about the stench, the fact that this is going to be viewed by the public as nakedly political, i think that was directed at the chief justice. she was trying to get him onside to stay on these two precedents, roe and casey, and i think he found immediately that she would find no quarter there. the chief justice did not seem interest in upholding those two cases. instead, he seemed more intent on brokering some kind of compromise that would eliminate t...

Republican appointed supreme court justices have supported roe vs. wade over decades and what it will mean if the current republican supreme court justices decide to overturn it. >> the right of a woman to choose, the right to control her own body has been clearly set since casey and never challenged. you want us to reject that line of viability and adopt something different. 15 justices over 50 years have -- or i should say 30 since casey -- have reaffirmed that basic viability line. four have said no. two of them members of this court. but 15 justices have said yes.

Part of his dna as he doesn't like a big, bold, dramatic moves, he's always looking to make small, incremental decisions but i think he is of the view that roe and casey were wrongly decided to. he is probably squarely in that camp. he is going to have a difficult job. once you get rid of the viability line, everybody who stood at that podium and argued admitted there is no alternative. every single one of them said is there a line you can draw other than viability and they all threw up their hands and said we don't think so. i don't know how he is going to do that. if you want the site europe...

Today, there was a narrative that went, this isn't really a 6-3 court, it's a 3-3 court that amy coney barrett and brett kavanaugh and the chief justice are incrementalists, they care about what people think, they worry about those legitimate questions you and nancy were just talking about, but they're going to tap the breaks, not do anything crazy. there was no reason to believe other than the chief justice, who was trying to figure out a middle way not to overturn roe, maybe we could move the viability line and be okay with a 15-week instead of 24-week ban. there was no reason to believe, ra...

Choose, the right to control her own body, the has been clearly set for us since casey and never challenged. you want us to reject that line of viability and adopt something different. 15 justices over 50 years have -- or should i say 30 since casey have reaffirmed that basic viability line for have said no, two of the members of the score. he four have said no, two of the members of the score, but 15 justices have said yes, a varying political backgrounds. now the sponsors of this bill, the house bill in mississippi said, we're doing it because we have new justices.