know if the president wants to exercise immunity or privilege on any of these questions so we can hash it out before you come. don t come here and surprise me with i m not answering those questions. that s all they asked for in the letter. whitaker doesn t do that. but then the doj says he s not coming there under threat of subpoena. well, then just answer the question about whether or not you re going to exercise the immunity. what s all the huff and puff about? it s a lot of washington gamesmanship. the reality is matthew whitaker is going to be a private citizen next week. when bar is confirmed by the senate. so it seems ridiculous to be conducting an oversight hearing with a guy out of a job in a week. the real reason democrats want whitaker in is they want to hurt barr. is if whitaker provides answers and barr deviates in anyway then that s problematic for barr down the road. i don t think this is going to go well tomorrow. for the administration or republicans. i don t find mat
subpoena, but the letter sent to the acting ag is, hey, let us know if the president wants to exercise immunity or privilege on any of these questions so we can hash it out before you come. don t come here and surprise me with i m not answering those questions. that s all they asked for in the letter. whitaker doesn t do that. but then the doj says he s not coming there under threat of subpoena. well, then just answer the question about whether or not you re going to exercise the immunity. what s all the huff and puff about? it s a lot of washington gamesmanship. the reality is matthew whitaker is going to be a private citizen next week. so it seems ridiculous to be conducting an oversight hearing with a guy out of a job in a week. the real reason democrats want whitaker in is they want to hurt barr. is if whitaker provides answers and barr deviates in anyway then that s problematic for barr down the road. i don t think this is going to go well tomorrow. i don t find matt whitaker to